Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38135508›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics2024

Cognitive-Enhancing Effects of Acetylcholine Receptor Agonists in Group-Housed Cynomolgus Monkeys Who Drink Ethanol.

Lindsey K Galbo-Thomma, Phillip M Epperly, Bruce E Blough, Antonio Landavazo, Santiago J Saldaña, F Ivy Carroll, Paul W Czoty

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A Little "Re-Cognition" Goes a Long Way for Pro-Cognitive Therapeutics in Alcohol Studies.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lindsey K Galbo-ThommaDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina (L.K.G.-T., P.M.E., S.J.S., P.W.C.) and Center for Drug Discovery, Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina (B.E.B., A.L., F.I.C.).ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8672-8323
Phillip M EpperlyDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina (L.K.G.-T., P.M.E., S.J.S., P.W.C.) and Center for Drug Discovery, Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina (B.E.B., A.L., F.I.C.).
Bruce E BloughDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina (L.K.G.-T., P.M.E., S.J.S., P.W.C.) and Center for Drug Discovery, Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina (B.E.B., A.L., F.I.C.).
Antonio LandavazoDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina (L.K.G.-T., P.M.E., S.J.S., P.W.C.) and Center for Drug Discovery, Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina (B.E.B., A.L., F.I.C.).
Santiago J SaldañaDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina (L.K.G.-T., P.M.E., S.J.S., P.W.C.) and Center for Drug Discovery, Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina (B.E.B., A.L., F.I.C.).
F Ivy CarrollDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina (L.K.G.-T., P.M.E., S.J.S., P.W.C.) and Center for Drug Discovery, Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina (B.E.B., A.L., F.I.C.).
Paul W CzotyDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina (L.K.G.-T., P.M.E., S.J.S., P.W.C.) and Center for Drug Discovery, Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina (B.E.B., A.L., F.I.C.) pczoty@wakehealth.edu.
Research Triangle Park Foundation · US

Funding

Wake Forest Translational Alcohol Research Center (WF-TARC)P50AA026117 · NIAAA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Colleen A Hanlon · 2018 to 2026
$16.2M
MULTI-DISCIPLINARY TRAINING IN THE BIOLOGY OF ALCOHOLISMT32AA007565 · NIAAA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI BRIAN A MCCOOL · 1994 to 2026
$10.1M
Cognitive Consequences of EtOH Consumption in Group-Housed Nonhuman PrimatesF31AA029588 · NIAAA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GALBO THOMMA, LINDSEY · 2022 to 2023
$82k
NIAAA NIH HHS F31 AA029588NIAAA NIH HHS P50 AA026117NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA007565
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cognitive impairments that are often observed in patients with alcohol use disorder (AUD) partially contribute to the extremely low rates of treatment initiation and adherence. Brain acetylcholine receptors (AChR) mediate and modulate cognitive and reward-related behavior, and their distribution can be altered by long-term heavy drinking. Therefore, AChRs are promising pharmacotherapeutic targets for treating the cognitive symptoms of AUD. In the present study, the procognitive efficacy of two AChR agonists, xanomeline and varenicline, were evaluated in group-housed monkeys who self-administered ethanol for more than 1 year. The muscarinic AChR antagonist scopolamine was used to disrupt performance of a serial stimulus discrimination and reversal (SDR) task designed to probe cognitive flexibility, defined as the ability to modify a previously learned behavior in response to a change in reinforcement contingencies. The ability of xanomeline and varenicline to remediate the disruptive effects of scopolamine was compared between socially dominant and subordinate monkeys, with lighter and heavier drinking histories, respectively. We hypothesized that subordinate monkeys would be more sensitive to all three drugs. Scopolamine dose-dependently impaired performance on the serial SDR task in all monkeys at doses lower than those that produced nonspecific impairments (e.g., sedation); its potency did not differ between dominant and subordinate monkeys. However, both AChR agonists were effective in remediating the scopolamine-induced deficit in subordinate monkeys but not in dominant monkeys. These findings suggest xanomeline and varenicline may be effective for enhancing cognitive flexibility in individuals with a history of heavy drinking. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Procognitive effects of two acetylcholine (ACh) receptor agonists were assessed in group-housed monkeys who had several years' experience drinking ethanol. The muscarinic ACh receptor agonist xanomeline and the nicotinic ACh receptor agonist varenicline reversed a cognitive deficit induced by the muscarinic ACh receptor antagonist scopolamine. However, this effect was observed only in lower-ranking (subordinate) monkeys and not higher-ranking (dominant monkeys). Results suggest that ACh agonists may effectively remediate alcohol-induced cognitive deficits in a subpopulation of those with alcohol use disorder.

Indexed as

EthanolMacaca fascicularisScopolamineAlcohol DrinkingAnimalsCholinergic AgonistsCognitionMaleNootropic AgentsVareniclineCholinergic AgonistsEthanolNootropic AgentsScopolamineVarenicline

Identifiers

PMID38135508
PMCPMC11125785
OpenAlexW4390096918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.