Observational studyLupus science & medicine2023
Steroid-sparing effect of belimumab: results from a retrospective observational study of real-world data.
Observational study in Lupus science & medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Duration of Belimumab Therapy and Timing of Initiation as Predictors of Clinical Outcomes in Childhood-Onset Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Real-World Retrospective Study.Rheumatology and therapy · 2026Article
- Efficacy of belimumab in patients with SLE and haematological manifestations: retrospective analysis from the BeRLiSS 2.0 cohort.Lupus science & medicine · 2026Article
- Practical insights for the clinical implementation of the EULAR recommendations for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.RMD open · 2025Article
- IgG4-Related Disease: Emerging Roles of Novel Genetic Variants, Immune Cell Subsets and Therapeutic Targets.Allergy · 2025Review
- Article
- Lupus Nephritis from Pathogenesis to New Therapies: An Update.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveComparison of oral corticosteroid (OCS) use in patients with SLE in a US rheumatology network pre- and post-belimumab initiation.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study (GSK Study 214140) used data from the Patient-Important Outcomes Data Repository (PIONEER)-Rheumatology database. Eligible adults with SLE initiated belimumab between 1 January 2012 and 30 June 2021, and had available data for >180 days pre- and >360 days post-belimumab initiation. The index was the date of belimumab initiation. Changes in OCS use were measured by: proportion of patients receiving OCS; mean total OCS dose/patient; mean total number of OCS days supplied/patient; mean daily OCS dose for days supplied/patient; the proportion of patients with OCS doses of ≤5 mg/day and ≤7.5 mg/day for days supplied. These changes were assessed between period (P)1 (6 months pre-index) and P2 (first 6 months post-index) and P3 (second 6 months post-index) in patients with OCS use in P1 who persisted with belimumab at each assessed period.
resultsOverall, 608 patients received belimumab for 180 days (full analysis set (FAS)) and 492 for 360 days. Most patients were female (92.8%); 70.4% had moderate SLE. In P1, 56.3% of FAS patients and 54.5% of patients who persisted with belimumab for 360 days received OCS.Among patients receiving OCS in P1, significantly fewer patients received OCS in P2 (78.4%) and P3 (64.9%) vs P1 (100.0%). Significant reductions from P1 were observed in P2 and P3 in the mean total OCS dose/patient, the mean OCS daily dose for days supplied and the proportions of patients with OCS dose of ≤5 mg/day and ≤7.5 mg/day, and the mean total OCS days supplied/patient in P3 only.
conclusionsThis analysis showed significant reductions in OCS dose and use in patients with SLE who persisted with belimumab, providing more real-world evidence for belimumab's steroid-sparing effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38135455What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.