Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38135329›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Brief digital self-care intervention for health anxiety in a Swedish Medical University Clinic: a prospective single-group feasibility study.

Susanna Österman, Amira Hentati, Erik Forsell, Erland Axelsson, Erik Hedman-Lagerlöf, Nils Lindefors, Volen Z Ivanov, Martin Kraepelien

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05446766 (Feasibility Evaluation of a Self-guided Exposure-based Digital Intervention for Health Anxiety), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05446766 nacompletednot on this map

Feasibility Evaluation of a Self-guided Exposure-based Digital Intervention for Health Anxiety

TypeinterventionalSponsorKarolinska InstitutetRan2022 to 2023Enrolled25ConditionsIllness Anxiety Disorder, Somatic Symptom DisorderArmsSelf-guided Exposure-based Digital Intervention for Health Anxiety
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Susanna ÖstermanDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden susanna.osterman@ki.se.ORCID 0000-0001-5031-5025
Amira HentatiDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Erik ForsellDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Erland AxelssonDivision of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2562-2925
Erik Hedman-LagerlöfDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Nils LindeforsDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Volen Z IvanovDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Martin KraepelienDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIn routine psychiatric care in Stockholm, Sweden, a comprehensive therapist-guided intervention for clinically significant health anxiety is implemented. However, there is a need for more easily accessible self-care interventions to improve treatment dissemination. This study aimed to transform an existing therapist-guided digital intervention into a self-care intervention, reducing patient burden and used clinical resources while maintaining quality and safety.

designAn uncontrolled feasibility study.

settingConducted at Karolinska Institutet, a medical university in Sweden, with nationwide recruitment trough online advertisements.

participantsTwenty-five adults used the self-care intervention and underwent telephone assessments, along with completing self-rated questionnaires.

interventionThe newly developed 8-week self-care intervention was designed to be user-friendly without therapist guidance, and to facilitate high levels of behavioural engagement. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Indicators of quality and safety, including changes in health anxiety severity (primary), clinician time, participant adherence, perceived credibility/satisfaction with the intervention and adverse events, were benchmarked against a previous study of the more comprehensive intervention it was based on.

resultsCompared with the original guided intervention, the self-care intervention was condensed in terms of text (up to 70% less reading), duration (8 weeks instead of 12) and number of exercises. Quality indicators were similar to the original version. Most participants worked actively with core components in the self-care intervention. Within-group effects on health anxiety from pretreatment to the 3-month follow-up were large (g=1.37; 95% CI 0.74 to 2.00). No serious adverse events were reported.

conclusionsThis brief digital self-care intervention shows potential for increasing access to treatment for individuals with health anxiety while reducing the burden on patients and clinical resources. Future studies should investigate the optimal type of intervention and support for different individuals, and if non-inferiority can be established. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05446766.

Indexed as

AnxietySelf CareAdultFeasibility StudiesHumansProspective StudiesSwedenUniversitiesanxiety disordersmental healthpsychiatry

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.