Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38135321›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Acceptance of COVID-19 vaccine and associated factors among healthcare workers in Katsina state: a cross-sectional study in Northwest Nigeria.

Ahmed Tijani Abubakar, Kabir Suleiman, Suleiman Idris Ahmad, Shamsuddeen Suleiman Yahaya, Umar Ibrahim Bello, Bello Abdullahi Suleiman, Suleiman Ahmed Haladu, Ahmad Ibrahim Al-Mustapha, Musa Imam Abubakar

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Ahmed Tijani AbubakarAfrica Centre for Disease Control, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Kabir SuleimanEpidemiology, Katsina State Primary Healthcare Agency, Katsina, Nigeria.
Suleiman Idris AhmadAfrican Field Epidemiology Network Nigeria, Abuja, Nigeria suleimanai001@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1792-0295
Shamsuddeen Suleiman YahayaKatsina State Primary Healthcare Agency, Katsina, Nigeria.
Umar Ibrahim BelloKatsina State Ministry of Health, Katsina, Nigeria.
Bello Abdullahi SuleimanFamily Medicine, Federal Medical Centre Katsina, Katsina, Nigeria.
Suleiman Ahmed HaladuAfrican Field Epidemiology Network Nigeria, Katsina, Nigeria.
Ahmad Ibrahim Al-MustaphaDepartment of Veterinary Services, Kwara State Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Ilorin, Nigeria.
Musa Imam AbubakarREDISSE Project, Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Abuja, Nigeria.
African Field Epidemiology Network · NGFederal Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development · NGAfrica Centres for Disease Control and Prevention · ETFederal Medical Centre · NGHassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic · NGNational Primary Health Care Development Agency · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesHealthcare workers were prioritised to receive the COVID-19 vaccine in Nigeria. Administration of COVID-19 vaccination in Nigeria was challenging because of a lack of trust in vaccine safety and vaccine effectiveness among healthcare workers, who are expected to provide reliable information about vaccines and vaccine-preventable diseases in the communities. Hence, their acceptance and attitudes towards COVID-19 preventive practices could influence the acceptance of the vaccine by the local population. This cross-sectional study assessed the acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine among healthcare workers in Katsina State. We predicted the variables that increased the vaccine acceptance using logistic regression analysis.

settingThis hospital-based study was conducted at primary, secondary and tertiary healthcare facilities in Nigeria.

participantsA total of 793 healthcare workers were included in this study. Of these, 65.4% (n=519) were male. OUTCOME MEASURES: To assess acceptance of COVID-19 vaccine measures, and factors increasing acceptance among healthcare workers.

resultsOf the healthcare workers, 80% (638) were tested for the SARS-CoV-2, of whom 10.8% (n=65) tested positive. Approximately 97% (n=765) of them believed that the COVID-19 vaccine was safe, and 90% (n=714) received the first dose of the vaccine. Healthcare workers between 30 and 39 years were more likely to accept the vaccine (aOR: 7.06; 95% CI 2.36 to 21.07; p<0.001). Those who had been tested for COVID-19 were more likely (aOR:7.64; 95% CI 3.62 to 16.16; p<0.001) to accept the vaccine.

conclusionsOur findings showed that the age and prior COVID-19 testing were the main factors influencing the acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine. There was high acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine among healthcare workers in Katsina State, Nigeria. Future studies should focus on the completion of doses and serological testing for immunity.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19 TestingCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleNigeriaSARS-CoV-2VaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19healthcare workersnigeriavaccine acceptance

Identifiers

PMID38135321
OpenAlexW4390116590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.