Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38135216›Full record

ReviewJournal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders2024

A mapping review of Pacific Vascular Symposium 6 initiatives.

Oscar Moreno, Kiran Kumar, Fedor Lurie, Marc A Passman, Glen Jacobowitz, Faisal Aziz, Peter Henke, Thomas Wakefield, Andrea Obi

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 59% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Oscar MorenoSection of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Kiran KumarSection of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Fedor LurieSection of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Jobst Vascular Institute of ProMedica, Toledo, OH.
Marc A PassmanUAB Vein Program and Clinic, Department of Surgery, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Glen JacobowitzSection of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, New York University, New York, NY.
Faisal AzizDivision of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA.
Peter HenkeSection of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Thomas WakefieldSection of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Andrea ObiSection of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. Electronic address: easta@med.umich.edu.
University of Michigan · USNew York University · USPennsylvania State University · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe 2010 Pacific Vascular Symposium 6 (PVS6) brought venous disease content experts together with a goal of addressing critical issues collated together in the next decade with concrete plans to achieve these goals. This mapping review aims to provide a broader representation of how progress in critical issues of chronic venous disease has been made by extrapolating scientific publications related to the PVS6 initiatives.

methodsWe performed a mapping review identifying original or systematic review/meta-analysis articles related to PVS 6 initiatives (aims) that addressed one of the following key objectives: scales to measure chronic venous disease, effectiveness of interventional deep venous thrombus removal, development of a deep venous valve, and biomarkers related to venous disease. Searches were undertaken in PubMed, Ovid Medline, Cochrane Library, Embase (Elsevier), CINAHL (EBSCO), and Scopus. We extracted descriptive information about the studies and predefined variables for each specific aim, showing what and where research exists on the aims included.

resultsA total of 2138 articles were screened from 3379 retrieved articles from six electronic databases. We mapped 186 included articles, finding that the total number of publications significantly increased after the 2010 PVS6 meeting. Aim results were visually summarized. The largest body of data addressed catheter-based thrombus removal strategies for acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis. Primary research on artificial venous valves and venous biomarkers remained limited. No new post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) score has been developed.

conclusionsThis mapping review identified and characterized the available evidence and gaps in our knowledge of chronic venous disease that exist visually, which may guide where more significant investments for the future should be targeted.

Indexed as

Vascular DiseasesVeinsChronic DiseaseCongresses as TopicHumansSystematic Reviews as TopicVenous ThrombosisChronic venous diseaseMapping reviewPacific Vascular Symposium

Identifiers

PMID38135216
PMCPMC11523466
OpenAlexW4389990493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.