Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38134941›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of perinatology2024

Fetal Growth and Adiposity of Infants Born Large for Gestational Age in Three Harmonized Randomized Trials.

Amanda J Poprzeczny, Jennie Louise, Andrea R Deussen, Jodie M Dodd

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of perinatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 71% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amanda J PoprzecznyThe University of Adelaide, The Robinson Research Institute, and Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6162-0305
Jennie LouiseThe University of Adelaide, The Robinson Research Institute, and Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Andrea R DeussenThe University of Adelaide, The Robinson Research Institute, and Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Jodie M DoddThe University of Adelaide, The Robinson Research Institute, and Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
The University of Adelaide · AUWomen's and Children's Hospital · AU

Funding

Limiting Weight Gain in Overweight Pregnant Women: Effects on Mother and ChildR01HL094235 · NHLBI · HARVARD PILGRIM HEALTH CARE, INC. · PI GILLMAN, MATTHEW W · 2008 to 2011
$1.3M
National Health and Medical Research Council ID 1043181National Health and Medical Research Council ID 1078980National Health and Medical Research Council ID 519240NIH HHS R01 HL094235-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveInfants born large for gestational age (LGA) are at an increased risk of short- and longer-term adverse outcomes. Understanding fetal growth and adiposity and their trajectories may help inform interventions to prevent birth of LGA infants. We aimed to compare fetal growth and adiposity measures of infants born LGA with those born not LGA, to determine whether the discrepancy at birth was primarily due to larger size throughout gestation, or instead to different trajectories of fetal growth. STUDY

designThis was a secondary analysis of secondary outcomes of fetal growth and adiposity from three harmonized randomized trials-the LIMIT, GRoW, and Optimise randomized trials. These trials recruited women in early pregnancy, and a singleton gestation, from three major public metropolitan Adelaide maternity hospitals. Maternal body mass index (BMI) ranged from 18.5 to ≥40.0 kg/m

resultsInfants born LGA had larger fetal biometry measures, and higher growth trajectories, from 20 weeks' gestation. Fetal adiposity measures were consistently larger among infants born LGA and these differences increased over time. We did not find evidence that the differences in biometry and adiposity measurements varied according to maternal BMI.

conclusionInfants born LGA had larger fetal biometry measures at all time points from 20 weeks' gestation, compared with infants born not LGA suggesting any interventions to prevent LGA likely need to commence earlier in pregnancy or prior to conception. KEY POINTS: · Infants born LGA had larger fetal biometry measures from 20 weeks' gestation.. · Infants born LGA had larger fetal adiposity measures.. · Interventions to prevent LGA need to start earlier in pregnancy or prior to conception..

Indexed as

AdiposityBody Mass IndexFetal DevelopmentFetal MacrosomiaGestational AgeUltrasonography, PrenatalAdultBirth WeightFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMalePregnancy

Identifiers

PMID38134941
PMCPMC11150064
OpenAlexW4390099504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.