Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38134888›Full record

SynthesisThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2024

Bedaquiline for treatment of non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM): a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Shatha Omar, Michael G Whitfield, Margaret B Nolan, Justice T Ngom, Nabila Ismail, Rob M Warren, Marisa Klopper

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Clonal spread of Mycobacterium monacense strains among patients with extrapulmonary mycobacteriosis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  6. A hidden threat: a case of relapsed disseminatedJournal of bone and joint infection · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Luciferase reporter mycobacteriophage (TM4::Journal of clinical microbiology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A Report of Two Uncommon Cases ofInfectious disease reports · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Toward better cures forClinical microbiology reviews · 2024
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Growing from common ground: nontuberculous mycobacteria and bronchiectasis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024
    Review
  19. Therapy ofMicroorganisms · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Shatha OmarDST/NRF Centre of Excellence for Biomedical Tuberculosis Research, South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC) Centre for Tuberculosis Research, Division of Molecular Biology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-1437-1019
Michael G WhitfieldHealth Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, National Institute for Health Research, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5956-8384
Margaret B NolanDST/NRF Centre of Excellence for Biomedical Tuberculosis Research, South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC) Centre for Tuberculosis Research, Division of Molecular Biology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
Justice T NgomDST/NRF Centre of Excellence for Biomedical Tuberculosis Research, South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC) Centre for Tuberculosis Research, Division of Molecular Biology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
Nabila IsmailDST/NRF Centre of Excellence for Biomedical Tuberculosis Research, South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC) Centre for Tuberculosis Research, Division of Molecular Biology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
Rob M WarrenDST/NRF Centre of Excellence for Biomedical Tuberculosis Research, South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC) Centre for Tuberculosis Research, Division of Molecular Biology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
Marisa KlopperDST/NRF Centre of Excellence for Biomedical Tuberculosis Research, South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC) Centre for Tuberculosis Research, Division of Molecular Biology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
South African Medical Research Council · ZANational Institute for Health Research · GB

Funding

European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership TMA2017-1885National Research FoundationSouth African Medical Research CouncilStellenbosch University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNon-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) infections are increasing in incidence and associated mortality. NTM are naturally resistant to a variety of antibiotics, complicating treatment. We conducted a literature assessment on the efficacy of bedaquiline in treating NTM species in vitro and in vivo (animal models and humans); meta-analyses were performed where possible.

methodFour databases were searched using specific terms. Publications were included according to predefined criteria. Bedaquiline's impact on NTM in vitro, MICs and epidemiological cut-off (ECOFF) values were evaluated. A meta-analysis of bedaquiline efficacy against NTM infections in animal models was performed. Culture conversion, cure and/or relapse-free cure were used to evaluate the efficacy of bedaquiline in treating NTM infection in humans.

resultsFifty studies met the inclusion criteria: 33 assessed bedaquiline's impact on NTM in vitro, 9 in animal models and 8 in humans. Three studies assessed bedaquiline's efficacy both in vitro and in vivo. Due to data paucity, an ECOFF value of 0.5 mg/mL was estimated for Mycobacterium abscessus only. Meta-analysis of animal studies showed a 1.86× reduction in bacterial load in bedaquiline-treated versus no treatment within 30 days. In humans, bedaquiline-including regimens were effective in treating NTM extrapulmonary infection but not pulmonary infection.

conclusionsBedaquiline demonstrated strong antibacterial activity against various NTM species and is a promising drug to treat NTM infections. However, data on the genomic mutations associated with bedaquiline resistance were scarce, preventing statistical analyses for most mutations and NTM species. Further studies are urgently needed to better inform treatment strategies.

Indexed as

Mycobacterium Infections, NontuberculousNontuberculous MycobacteriaAnti-Bacterial AgentsDiarylquinolinesHumansAnti-Bacterial AgentsbedaquilineDiarylquinolines

Identifiers

PMID38134888
PMCPMC10832598
OpenAlexW4390095939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.