Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38134615›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2024

Treatment of giant prostatic urethral stone with prostatolithotomy case report.

Yunus Erol Bozkurt, Caner Buğra Akdeniz, Bilali Habeş Gümüş

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 66% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yunus Erol BozkurtManisa Merkez Efendi State Hospital, Department of Urology, Manisa, Turkey. Electronic address: yunusbozkurt88@hotmail.com.
Caner Buğra Akdenizİzmir Foça State Hospital, Department of Urology, İzmir, Turkey.
Bilali Habeş GümüşManisa Celal Bayar University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Urology, Manisa, Turkey.
Manisa Celal Bayar University · TRSivas State Hospital · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe patient with prostatic urethral stones of the size mentioned in the case report is very rare, and there is no standard surgical procedure for patients with giant stones in the prostatic urethra. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 62-year-old male patient presented to the emergency department with complaints of dysuria and hematuria. Computed tomography showed a prostatic urethral stone measuring 78x48x56 mm. Open prostatolithotomy was performed by extending the bladder incision towards the prostate capsule and the stone was removed. DISCUSSION: Prostate stones can be classified into two types: true prostate stones, which form within the prostate's tissues, and urethral stones, which develop in the prostatic urethra. Urethral stones can be primary (forming in the urethra) or secondary (migrating from the upper urinary tract).

conclusionTreatment options vary based on stone size and patient history, with endoscopy recommended as the primary approach. However, in cases with large stone burdens, open surgical methods may be preferred.

Indexed as

Case reportGiant stoneProstateUrethral stone

Identifiers

PMID38134615
PMCPMC10800754
OpenAlexW4390009711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.