Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38134220›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2023

Combined analysis of transposable elements and structural variation in maize genomes reveals genome contraction outpaces expansion.

Manisha Munasinghe, Andrew Read, Michelle C Stitzer, Baoxing Song, Claire C Menard, Kristy Yubo Ma, Yaniv Brandvain, Candice N Hirsch, Nathan Springer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
10.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Structural variants contribute to phenotypic variation in maize.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Manisha MunasingheDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0337-6535
Andrew ReadDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, United States of America.
Michelle C StitzerInstitute for Genomic Diversity, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4140-3765
Baoxing SongPeking University Institute of Advanced Agricultural Sciences, Weifang, China.
Claire C MenardDepartment of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8185-1493
Kristy Yubo MaDepartment of Mathematics, Statistics, and Computer Science, Macalester College, St. Paul, Minnesota, United States of America.ORCID 0009-0004-3173-5648
Yaniv BrandvainDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, United States of America.
Candice N HirschDepartment of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8833-3023
Nathan SpringerDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, United States of America.
University of Minnesota · USCornell University · USMacalester College · USPeking University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Structural differences between genomes are a major source of genetic variation that contributes to phenotypic differences. Transposable elements, mobile genetic sequences capable of increasing their copy number and propagating themselves within genomes, can generate structural variation. However, their repetitive nature makes it difficult to characterize fine-scale differences in their presence at specific positions, limiting our understanding of their impact on genome variation. Domesticated maize is a particularly good system for exploring the impact of transposable element proliferation as over 70% of the genome is annotated as transposable elements. High-quality transposable element annotations were recently generated for de novo genome assemblies of 26 diverse inbred maize lines. We generated base-pair resolved pairwise alignments between the B73 maize reference genome and the remaining 25 inbred maize line assemblies. From this data, we classified transposable elements as either shared or polymorphic in a given pairwise comparison. Our analysis uncovered substantial structural variation between lines, representing both simple and complex connections between TEs and structural variants. Putative insertions in SNP depleted regions, which represent recently diverged identity by state blocks, suggest some TE families may still be active. However, our analysis reveals that within these recently diverged genomic regions, deletions of transposable elements likely account for more structural variation events and base pairs than insertions. These deletions are often large structural variants containing multiple transposable elements. Combined, our results highlight how transposable elements contribute to structural variation and demonstrate that deletion events are a major contributor to genomic differences.

Indexed as

DNA Transposable ElementsZea maysGenomicsHumansDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID38134220
PMCPMC10773942
OpenAlexW4390099756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.