ArticleUpdates in surgery2024
Initial experience of robotically assisted endometriosis surgery with a novel robotic system: first case series in a tertiary care center.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Emerging robotic platforms in gynecologic surgery: a systematic review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- The Hugo™ RAS system in gynecologic robotic surgery: a systematic review of current applications.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Factors contributing to the delayed diagnosis of endometriosis-a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Robotic assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for deep endometriosis: a meta-analysis of current evidence.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Ultrasound-guided robotic surgical procedures: a systematic review.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Pooled it
- Optimizing arm placement in the HugoUpdates in surgery · 2025Article
- Surgical Reconstruction of Abdominal Wall Endometriosis Post-Cesarean Section: A Monocentric Experience of a Rare Pathology.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Unveiling the real benefits of robot-assisted surgery in gynaecology: from telesurgery to image-guided surgery and artificial intelligence.Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2025Article
- Association of urinary tract endometriosis with physical and mental health: a cross-sectional study.BMC women's health · 2025Article
- Minimally Invasive Rectal Surgery: Current Status and Future Perspectives in the Era of Digital Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence, the ChatGPT Large Language Model: Assessing the Accuracy of Responses to the Gynaecological Endoscopic Surgical Education and Assessment (GESEA) Level 1-2 knowledge tests.Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2024Article
- Skill progress during a dedicated societal robotic surgery training curriculum including several robotic surgery platforms.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Observational
- Robotic platforms in gynaecological surgery: past, present, and future.Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2024Article
- Identifying key predictors for uterine manipulator use in robotic simple hysterectomy: a retrospective cohort analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Robotic surgery for deep-infiltrating endometriosis: is it time to take a step forward?Frontiers in medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Endometriosis is a benign disease requiring surgery if medical treatment can not achieve symptom control. Laparoscopy remains the gold standard and robotic assistance can be beneficial in complex cases. Robot-assisted radical endometriosis excision using the Hugo™ RAS system is a novel approach. The aim of this study is to describe its setting and outcomes in a series of patients in a robotic surgery center. Endometriosis patients who consecutively underwent robot-assisted surgery with the Hugo™ RAS system (Medtronic, USA) were retrospectively enrolled. Disease-specific symptoms before and after surgery, endometriosis stage, as well as perioperative and intraoperative variables including system setup were collected. Early post-operative complications (< 30 days) and follow-up (up to 3 months) were reported. All procedures were completed robotically. Port placement followed the "bridge" configuration with a "compact" docking. The median operative time was 186.5 min (IQR 174-220), the median estimated blood loss 50 ml (IQR 0-100). An intraoperative complication occurred in one patient (6.6%), a bladder laceration with postoperative antibiotic treatment. The median lenght of hospital stay (LOS) was 3 days (IQR 3-4). Surgery achieved a statistically significant decrease in symptoms: mean dysmenorrhea (9.50 ± 0.83 versus 1.7 ± 2.26; p = 0.001), dyschezia (4.27 ± 3.61 versus 2.40 ± 2.92; p = 0.026), dysuria (2.73 ± 3.39 versus 1.87 ± 2.41; p = 0.358), dyspareunia (6.53 ± 3.15 versus 2.93 ± 2.89; p = 0.002) and chronic pelvic pain (8.8 ± 1.20 versus 3.20 ± 2.39; p = 0.001). The integration of this platform in the described configuration was safe with regular perioperative outcomes and significant improvement in symptoms. Prospective comparative studies with a larger cohort and longer follow-up are needed to assess potential advantages over the current gold standard.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.