Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38133707›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2024

Prognostic effect of nodal status before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: a Dutch population-based study.

Sabine R de Wild, Linetta B Koppert, Linda de Munck, Marie-Jeanne T F D Vrancken Peeters, Sabine Siesling, Marjolein L Smidt, Janine M Simons

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Sabine R de WildDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands. s.dewild@maastrichtuniversity.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6110-2308
Linetta B KoppertDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Linda de MunckDepartment of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Marie-Jeanne T F D Vrancken PeetersDepartment of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sabine SieslingDepartment of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Marjolein L SmidtDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Janine M SimonsDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLNetherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation · NLMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLUniversity Medical Center · US

Funding

KWF Kankerbestrijding 12518
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn breast cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) can downstage the nodal status, and can even result in a pathological complete response, which is associated with improved prognosis. This study aimed to determine the prognostic effect of nodal status before and after NAC.

methodsWomen with breast cancer treated with NAC were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry if diagnosed between 2005 and 2019, and classified based on nodal status before NAC: node-negative (cN0), or node-positive based on fine needle aspiration cytology or core needle biopsy (cN+). Subgroups were based on nodal status after NAC: absence (ypN0) or presence (ypN+) of nodal disease. Five-year overall survival (OS) was assessed with Kaplan-Meier survival analyses, also per breast cancer molecular subtype. To adjust for potential confounders, multivariable analyses were performed.

resultsA total of 6,580 patients were included in the cN0 group, and 11,878 in the cN+ group. The 5-year OS of the cN0ypN0-subgroup was statistically significant better than that of the cN+ypN0-subgroup (94.4% versus 90.1%, p < 0.0001). In cN0 as well as cN+ disease, ypN+ had a statistically significant worse 5-year OS compared to ypN0. For hormone receptor (HR)+ human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-, HR+ HER2+, HR-HER2+, and triple negative disease, respectively, 5-year OS in the cN0ypN+-subgroup was 89.7%, 90.4%, 73.7%, and 53.6%, and in the cN+ypN+-subgroup 84.7%, 83.2%, 61.4%, and 48.8%. In multivariable analyses, cN+ and ypN+ disease were both associated with worse OS.

conclusionThis study suggests that both cN-status and ypN-status, and molecular subtype should be considered to further improve prognostication.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLymph NodesNeoadjuvant TherapyPrognosisBreast cancerNeoadjuvant chemotherapyNodal statusPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID38133707
OpenAlexW4390104032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.