Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38133675›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2024

A conditional inference tree model for predicting cancer risk of non-mass lesions detected on breast ultrasound.

Xi Wang, Luxia Jing, Lixia Yan, Peilei Wang, Chongke Zhao, Huixiong Xu, Hansheng Xia

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. CT-Based deep learning platform combined with clinical parameters for predicting different discharge outcome in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xi Wang *Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University, 180 Feng-Lin Road, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.
Luxia Jing *Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University, 180 Feng-Lin Road, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.
Lixia YanDepartment of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University, 180 Feng-Lin Road, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.
Peilei WangDepartment of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University, 180 Feng-Lin Road, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.
Chongke ZhaoDepartment of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University, 180 Feng-Lin Road, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.
Huixiong XuDepartment of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University, 180 Feng-Lin Road, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.
Hansheng XiaDepartment of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University, 180 Feng-Lin Road, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China. zs12036xhs@yeah.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3587-4934
Fudan University · CN

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai 22ZR1400100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo generate and validate a prediction model based on imaging features for cancer risk of non-mass lesions (NMLs) detected on breast ultrasound (US).

methodsIn this single-center study, consecutive women with 503 NMLs detected on breast US between 2012 and 2019 were retrospectively identified. The lesions were randomly assigned to the training or testing dataset with a 70/30 split. Age, symptoms, lesion size, and US features were collected. Multivariate analyses were employed to identify risk factors associated with malignancy. The predictive model was developed by using conditional inference trees (CTREE).

resultsThere were 498 patients (50.9 ± 13.29 years; range, 22-88 years) with 503 NMLs with histopathologic results or > 2-year follow-up, including 224 (44.5%) benign and 279 (55.5%) malignant lesions. At multivariate analysis, age (odds ratio (OR) = 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.06-1.11, p < 0.001), NMLs with focal mass effect (OR = 3.03, 95% CI, 1.59-5.81, p = 0.001), indistinct glandular-fat interface (GFI) (OR = 4.23, 95% CI, 2.31-7.73, p < 0.001), geographic (OR = 3.47, 95% CI, 1.20-10.8, p = 0.022) and mottled (OR = 3.67, 95% CI, 1.32-10.21, p = 0.013) patterns, and calcifications (OR = 2.15, 95% CI, 1.16-4.01, p = 0.016) were associated with malignancy. The GFI status, architectural patterns, general morphology, and calcifications were consistently identified as the strongest US predictors of malignancy using CTREE analysis. Based on these factors, individuals were stratified into six risk groups. The predictive model showed an area under the curve of 0.797 in the testing dataset.

conclusionThe CTREE model efficiently aids in interpreting and managing ultrasound-detected breast NMLs, overcoming BI-RADS limitations by refining cancer risk stratification. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The CTREE model allows for the reclassification of BI-RADS categories into subgroups with varying malignancy probabilities, thus providing a valuable enhancement to the BI-RADS assessment for the diagnosis of ultrasound-detected NMLs, with the potential to minimize unnecessary biopsies. KEY POINTS: • The indistinct glandular-fat interface (GFI) status, NML with focal mass effect, geographic or mottled patterns, and calcifications are the strongest imaging predictors of malignant non-mass lesions (NMLs) detected on breast US. • A practical system has been created to categorize NMLs found in breast US; each classification is associated with a degree of diagnostic certainty. • The model may contribute to patient stratification by determining the relative likelihood of malignancy and thus support clinical decision-making and evidence-based management.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsUltrasonography, MammaryAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreastFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsYoung AdultBreastDiagnosisMalignancyUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID38133675
OpenAlexW4390105323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.