Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38133667›Full record

ArticleGlobal health action2023

Implementing the QUALI-DEC project in Argentina, Burkina Faso, Thailand and Viet Nam: a process delineation and theory-driven process evaluation protocol.

Amanda Cleeve, Kristi Sidney Annerstedt, Ana Pilar Betrán, Helle Mölsted Alvesson, Charles Kaboré Wendyam, Guillermo Carroli, Pisake Lumbiganon, Mac Quoc Nhu Hung, Karen Zamboni, Newton Opiyo and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health action, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 11 institutions in 11 countries.

Amanda CleeveDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, and Karolinska University Healthcare facility, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8115-5503
Kristi Sidney AnnerstedtDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8798-4027
Ana Pilar BetránUNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/World Bank Special Program of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5631-5883
Helle Mölsted AlvessonDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6109-7203
Charles Kaboré WendyamInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Guillermo CarroliCentro Rosarino de Estudios Perinatales, Rosario, Argentina.
Pisake LumbiganonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-9372-0071
Mac Quoc Nhu HungPham Ngoc Thach University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Karen ZamboniDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3478-8636
Newton OpiyoUNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/World Bank Special Program of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Meghan A BohrenGender and Women's Health Unit, Centre for Health Equity, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4179-4682
Soha El HalabiDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7107-9367
Celina GialdiniCentro Rosarino de Estudios Perinatales, Rosario, Argentina.
Mercedes Vila OrtizDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6781-2949
Ramón EscurietFaculty of Health Sciences, Fundacio Blanquerna, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7277-3331
Michael RobsonThe National Maternity Hospital and University College Dublin, National University of Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Alexandre DumontUniversité Paris Cité, Research Institute for Sustainable Development (IRD), Inserm, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3826-0193
Claudia HansonDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8066-7873
Karolinska Institutet · SECentro Rosarino de Estudios Perinatales · ARWorld Health Organization · CHGeneralitat de Catalunya · ESGlobal Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria · CHInserm · FRInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé · BFKhon Kaen University · THPham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine · VNThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversity College Dublin · IE

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The project 'Quality Decision-making by women and providers' (QUALI-DEC) combines four non-clinical interventions to promote informed decision-making surrounding mode of birth, improve women's birth experiences, and reduce caesarean sections among low-risk women. QUALI-DEC is currently being implemented in 32 healthcare facilities across Argentina, Burkina Faso, Thailand, and Viet Nam. In this paper, we detail implementation processes and the planned process evaluation, which aims to assess how and for whom QUALI-DEC worked, the mechanisms of change and their interactions with context and setting; adaptations to intervention and implementation strategies, feasibility of scaling-up, and cost-effectiveness of the intervention. We developed a project theory of change illustrating how QUALI-DEC might lead to impact. The theory of change, together with on the ground observations of implementation processes, guided the process evaluation strategy including what research questions and perspectives to prioritise. Main data sources will include: 1) regular monitoring visits in healthcare facilities, 2) quantitative process and output indicators, 3) a before and after cross-sectional survey among post-partum women, 4) qualitative interviews with all opinion leaders, and 5) qualitative interviews with postpartum women and health workers in two healthcare facilities per country, as part of a case study approach. We foresee that the QUALI-DEC process evaluation will generate valuable information that will improve interpretation of the effectiveness evaluation. At the policy level, we anticipate that important lessons and methodological insights will be drawn, with application to other settings and stakeholders looking to implement complex interventions aiming to improve maternal and newborn health and wellbeing.

Indexed as

Cross-Sectional StudiesArgentinaBurkina FasoFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyThailandVietnamevidence-based practicesimplementation scienceinformed decision-makingmaternal healthmultifaceted interventionNon-clinical interventionsQUALI-DECtheory of change

Identifiers

PMID38133667
PMCPMC10763892
OpenAlexW4390115043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.