Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38133463›Full record

ArticlePharmacy (Basel, Switzerland)2023

A Qualitative Evaluation of the Australian Community Pharmacy Agreement.

John K Jackson, Betty B Chaar, Carl M Kirkpatrick, Shane L Scahill, Michael Mintrom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

John K JacksonFaculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.
Betty B ChaarSchool of Pharmacy, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8757-9403
Carl M KirkpatrickFaculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.
Shane L ScahillSchool of Pharmacy, University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-5350-696X
Michael MintromSchool of Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7163-3997

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Australian Federal Government's Community Pharmacy Agreement (Agreement), initiated in 1990 and renegotiated every five years with a pharmacy owners' organisation, is the dominant policy directing community pharmacy. We studied the experience with the Agreements of 38 purposively selected individual pharmacists and others of diverse backgrounds, using in-depth, semi-structured interviews. Although perceived to lack transparency in negotiation and operation, as well as paucity of outcome measures, the Agreements have generally supported the viability of community pharmacies and on balance, contributed positively to the public's access to medicines. There were, however, contradictory opinions regarding the impact of the policy's regulation of pharmacy locations, including the suggestion that they provide existing owners with an undue commercial advantage. A reported shortcoming of the Agreements was their impact on pharmacists' abilities to expand their scopes of practice and assist patients to make better use of medicines, in part due to the funding being almost totally focused on supply-related functions. The support for programs such as medication management services was perceived to be limited, and opportunities for diversification in pharmacy practice appeared constrained. Future pharmacy policy developed by the government could be more inclusive of a diverse range of stakeholders, seek to better utilise pharmacists' expertise, and have a greater focus on health outcomes.

Indexed as

community pharmacyfundingmedication managementpolicyscope of practice

Identifiers

PMID38133463
PMCPMC10747587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.