Article in Toxics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literature
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
9 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.
Jia-De LeeDepartment of Environmental Science and Engineering, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Neipu, Pingtung 91201, Taiwan.
Tsyr-Huei ChiouDepartment of Life Sciences, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701, Taiwan.
Hong-Jie ZhangSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100811, China.ORCID 0009-0000-8252-9159
How-Ran ChaoDepartment of Environmental Science and Engineering, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Neipu, Pingtung 91201, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-6492-6417
Kuang-Yu ChenNational Applied Research Laboratories, Taiwan Ocean Research Institute, Kaohsiung 852, Taiwan.
Yan-You GouDepartment of Environmental Science and Engineering, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Neipu, Pingtung 91201, Taiwan.
Chien-Er HuangDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Mechanical Engineering, Cheng Shiu University, Niaosong District, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan.
Sheng-Lun LinDepartment of Environmental Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701, Taiwan.
Lin-Chi WangDepartment of Marine Environmental Engineering, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Nanzih District, Kaohsiung 81157, Taiwan.
National Cheng Kung University · TWNational Pingtung University of Science and Technology · TWBeijing Institute of Technology · CNCheng Shiu University · TWKaohsiung Medical University · TWNational Institutes of Applied Research · TWNational Kaohsiung Marine University · TW
Funding
National Science and Technology Council MOST 103-2221-E-020-002-MY3 and 106-2221-E-020-001-MY3
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
POP data are limited in the marine environment; thus, this study aimed to investigate background persistent organic pollutant (POP) levels in oceanic deep-water-deposited particulates in the South China Sea (SCS). Six POPs, including polychlorinated dibenzo-
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Persistent Halogenated Organic Pollutants in Deep-Water-Deposited Particulates from South China Sea. · full record | OpenQuestion