Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38133159›Full record

ArticleCritical care science2023

Physical rehabilitation in Brazilian pediatric intensive care units: a multicenter point prevalence study.

Juliana Redivo, Harini Kannan, Andreia Aparecida Freitas Souza, José Colleti Junior, Sapna Ravi Kudchadkar, Acute Rehabilitation for Kids in the PICU (PARK-PICU) Investigators, Nelson Kazunobu Horigoshi, Graziela de Araújo Costa, Taísa Roberta Ramos de Castilho, Paula Peres Domingues Peron and 16 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Juliana RedivoDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Charlotte R. Bloomberg Children's Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine - Baltimore, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-0841-9030
Harini KannanDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Charlotte R. Bloomberg Children's Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine - Baltimore, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-0151-3453
Andreia Aparecida Freitas SouzaDepartment of Pediatrics, Hospital Infantil Sabará - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8784-6732
José Colleti JuniorDepartment of Pediatrics, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6734-5765
Sapna Ravi KudchadkarDepartment of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine - Baltimore, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3089-0318
Acute Rehabilitation for Kids in the PICU (PARK-PICU) Investigators
Nelson Kazunobu HorigoshiHospital Infantil Sabará, São Paulo, SP Brazil.
Graziela de Araújo CostaHospital Sírio- Libanês, São Paulo, SP Brazil.
Taísa Roberta Ramos de CastilhoHospital Anália Franco Rede D'Or São Luiz Brazil.
Paula Peres Domingues PeronInstituto de Criança, Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP Brazil.
Walter Perez ScarantoHospital Municipal Carmino Caricchio, Tatuapé, São Paulo, SP Brazil.
Daniela Nasu Monteiro MedeirosHospital Municipal Dr. Moyses Deutch, M'Boi Mirim, São Paulo, SP Brazil.
Toshio MatsumotoHospital Municipal Infantil Menino Jesus, São Paulo, SP Brazil.
Carlos Gustavo de AlmeidaHospital Assunção Rede D'Or São Luiz, São Bernardo do Campo, SP Brazil.
Felipe Rezende Caino de OliveiraGrupo de Apoio ao Adolescente e à Criança com Câncer, Instituto de Oncologia Pediátrica, São Paulo, SP Brazil.
Marcelo Barciela BrandãoUniversidade de Campinas, Campinas, SP Brazil.
Fernanda Lima-SettaInstituto Fernandes Figueira, FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ Brazil.
Arnaldo Prata-BarbosaHospital Copa D'Or, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Glaciele Nascimento XavierInstituto de Cardiologia do Distrito Federal, Brasília, DF, Brasil.
Livia Barbosa de AndradeHospital Esperança, Recife, PE, Brasil.
Agda Ultra de AguiarHospital de Base do Distrito Federal, Brasília, DF Brazil.
Marcos Paulo Galdino CoutinhoHospital Otávio de Freitas, Recife, PE, Brasil.
Roberta Esteves Viera de CastroHospital Universitário Pedro Ernesto, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ Brazil.
Glazia André LandyInstituto de Tratamento do Câncer Infantil - São Paulo, SP Brazil.
Suzana Lopes Bonfim BalaniucHospital Universitário Maria Aparecida Pedrossian, Campo Grande, MS Brazil.
Ricardo Silveira YamaguchiHospital da Luz, São Paulo, SP Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the prevalence and factors associated with the physical rehabilitation of critically ill children in Brazilian pediatric intensive care units.

methodsA 2-day, cross-sectional, multicenter point prevalence study comprising 27 pediatric intensive care units (out of 738) was conducted in Brazil in April and June 2019. This Brazilian study was part of a large multinational study called Prevalence of Acute Rehabilitation for Kids in the PICU (PARK-PICU). The primary outcome was the prevalence of mobility provided by physical therapy or occupational therapy. Clinical data on patient mobility, potential mobility safety events, and mobilization barriers were prospectively collected in patients admitted for ≥ 72 hours.

resultsChildren under the age of 3 years comprised 68% of the patient population. The prevalence of therapist-provided mobility was 74%, or 277 out of the 375 patient-days. Out-of-bed mobility was most positively associated with family presence (adjusted odds ratios 3.31;95%CI 1.70 - 6.43) and most negatively associated with arterial lines (adjusted odds ratios 0.16; 95%CI 0.05 - 0.57). Barriers to mobilization were reported on 27% of patient-days, the most common being lack of physician order (n = 18). Potential safety events occurred in 3% of all mobilization events.

conclusionTherapist-provided mobility in Brazilian pediatric intensive care units is frequent. Family presence was high and positively associated with out-of-bed mobility. The presence of physiotherapists 24 hours a day in Brazilian pediatric intensive care units may have a substantial impact on the mobilization of critically ill children.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessEarly AmbulationBrazilChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesHumansIntensive Care Units, PediatricPrevalence

Identifiers

PMID38133159
PMCPMC10734802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.