Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38133137›Full record

ArticleMethods and protocols2023

The Integrated Health Monitor COVID-19: A Protocol for a Comprehensive Assessment of the Short- and Long-Term Health Impact of the Pandemic in the Netherlands.

Anouk van Duinkerken, Mark Bosmans, Christos Baliatsas, Nannah Tak, Anne Meerdink, Noortje Jansen, Marjonneke de Vetten-Mc Mahon, Elske Marra, Michel Dückers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods and protocols, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anouk van DuinkerkenNivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), 3513CR Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0002-7673-6623
Mark BosmansNivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), 3513CR Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9479-8604
Christos BaliatsasNivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), 3513CR Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9737-1224
Nannah TakGGD GHOR Nederland (Overarching Organization of the Municipal Health Services), 3524JS Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Anne MeerdinkGGD GHOR Nederland (Overarching Organization of the Municipal Health Services), 3524JS Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Noortje JansenARQ National Psychotrauma Centre, 1110AE Diemen, The Netherlands.
Marjonneke de Vetten-Mc MahonRIVM (National Institute for Public Health and the Environment), 3720BA Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Elske MarraRIVM (National Institute for Public Health and the Environment), 3720BA Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2857-392X
Michel DückersNivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), 3513CR Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7746-053X

Funding

Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development 10430212120022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe global COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly affected public health. Directly, the pandemic resulted in over 6.6 million deaths, numerous hospitalizations, and widespread illness. The pandemic has also affected health indirectly through government-imposed protective measures, causing decline in mental well-being and increasing social isolation. Unlike previous disasters or crises, the pandemic's worldwide and enduring impact necessitates a unique research approach. The Network for Health Research in Disasters in the Netherlands responded by initiating a longitudinal, extensive research project called the Integrated Health Monitor COVID-19. The Integrated Health Monitor COVID-19 explores both the direct and indirect health effects of the pandemic at the population level.

methodsThe Integrated Health Monitor COVID-19 employs a dual-pronged monitoring strategy alongside an annual literature review. This strategy comprises short-cycle monitoring (conducted quarterly) and long-cycle monitoring (conducted once every one or two years). This comprehensive approach enables the evaluation of health trends during the pandemic, facilitating comparisons with pre-pandemic levels and identification of risk and protective factors. Both monitoring methods incorporate data from surveys and general practice registries. The integration of annual literature reviews with these measurements enables iterative research, while dialogues on policy and practice improvements enhance the knowledge-to-action process. DISCUSSION: Much of the existing knowledge about the potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic is derived from research on sudden-onset disasters limited to specific geographical areas. This study is anticipated to provide valuable fresh insights into the evolving dynamics of population health and specific vulnerabilities within the ongoing pandemic context.

Indexed as

coronavirusCOVID-19lockdownlongitudinalmental healthpandemicpublic health

Identifiers

PMID38133137
PMCPMC10745633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.