Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38133077›Full record

ArticleTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)2023

MSTAC: A Multi-Stage Automated Classification of COVID-19 Chest X-ray Images Using Stacked CNN Models.

Thanakorn Phumkuea, Thakerng Wongsirichot, Kasikrit Damkliang, Asma Navasakulpong, Jarutas Andritsch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Thanakorn PhumkueaCollege of Digital Science, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla 90110, Thailand.
Thakerng WongsirichotDivision of Computational Science, Faculty of Science, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla 90110, Thailand.
Kasikrit DamkliangDivision of Computational Science, Faculty of Science, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla 90110, Thailand.
Asma NavasakulpongDivision of Respiratory and Respiratory Critical Care Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla 90110, Thailand.
Jarutas AndritschFaculty of Business, Law and Digital Technologies, Solent University, Southampton SO14 0YN, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study introduces a Multi-Stage Automated Classification (MSTAC) system for COVID-19 chest X-ray (CXR) images, utilizing stacked Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) models. Suspected COVID-19 patients often undergo CXR imaging, making it valuable for disease classification. The study collected CXR images from public datasets and aimed to differentiate between COVID-19, non-COVID-19, and healthy cases. MSTAC employs two classification stages: the first distinguishes healthy from unhealthy cases, and the second further classifies COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 cases. Compared to a single CNN-Multiclass model, MSTAC demonstrated superior classification performance, achieving 97.30% accuracy and sensitivity. In contrast, the CNN-Multiclass model showed 94.76% accuracy and sensitivity. MSTAC's effectiveness is highlighted in its promising results over the CNN-Multiclass model, suggesting its potential to assist healthcare professionals in efficiently diagnosing COVID-19 cases. The system outperformed similar techniques, emphasizing its accuracy and efficiency in COVID-19 diagnosis. This research underscores MSTAC as a valuable tool in medical image analysis for enhanced disease classification.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 TestingHumansNeural Networks, ComputerX-RaysCNNCOVID-19CXRdeep learningmulticlass model

Identifiers

PMID38133077
PMCPMC10747997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.