Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38133073›Full record

SynthesisTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)2023

A Systematic Literature Review of 3D Deep Learning Techniques in Computed Tomography Reconstruction.

Hameedur Rahman, Abdur Rehman Khan, Touseef Sadiq, Ashfaq Hussain Farooqi, Inam Ullah Khan, Wei Hong Lim

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. X-ray data reconstruction from incomplete data sampling.Journal of applied crystallography · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hameedur RahmanDepartment of Computer Games Development, Faculty of Computing & AI, Air University, E9, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0001-8892-9911
Abdur Rehman KhanDepartment of Creative Technologies, Faculty of Computing & AI, Air University, E9, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan.ORCID 0009-0008-9629-8361
Touseef SadiqCentre for Artificial Intelligence Research, Department of Information and Communication Technology, University of Agder, Jon Lilletuns vei 9, 4879 Grimstad, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-6603-3639
Ashfaq Hussain FarooqiDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Computing AI, Air University, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-4540-8697
Inam Ullah KhanDepartment of Electronic Engineering, School of Engineering & Applied Sciences (SEAS), Isra University, Islamabad Campus, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-3637-6977
Wei Hong LimFaculty of Engineering, Technology and Built Environment, UCSI University, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-1673-8088

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computed tomography (CT) is used in a wide range of medical imaging diagnoses. However, the reconstruction of CT images from raw projection data is inherently complex and is subject to artifacts and noise, which compromises image quality and accuracy. In order to address these challenges, deep learning developments have the potential to improve the reconstruction of computed tomography images. In this regard, our research aim is to determine the techniques that are used for 3D deep learning in CT reconstruction and to identify the training and validation datasets that are accessible. This research was performed on five databases. After a careful assessment of each record based on the objective and scope of the study, we selected 60 research articles for this review. This systematic literature review revealed that convolutional neural networks (CNNs), 3D convolutional neural networks (3D CNNs), and deep learning reconstruction (DLR) were the most suitable deep learning algorithms for CT reconstruction. Additionally, two major datasets appropriate for training and developing deep learning systems were identified: 2016 NIH-AAPM-Mayo and MSCT. These datasets are important resources for the creation and assessment of CT reconstruction models. According to the results, 3D deep learning may increase the effectiveness of CT image reconstruction, boost image quality, and lower radiation exposure. By using these deep learning approaches, CT image reconstruction may be made more precise and effective, improving patient outcomes, diagnostic accuracy, and healthcare system productivity.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAlgorithmsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerTomography, X-Ray Computed3D deep learning (3DDL)computed tomography (CT) reconstructionsystematic literature review

Identifiers

PMID38133073
PMCPMC10748093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.