Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38132975›Full record

ArticleNeurology international2023

Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization versus Surgery in Patients with Chronic Subdural Hematoma-No More Fence Sitting?

Dalibor Sila, Francisco Luis Casnati, Mária Vojtková, Philipp Kirsch, Stefan Rath, František Charvát

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. The safety and feasibility of anticoagulant resumption following middle meningeal artery embolization in patients with subacute subdural hematomas.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Dalibor SilaDepartment of Neurosurgery and Interventional Neuroradiology, Donau Isar Klinikum Deggendorf, Perlasberger Str. 41, 94469 Deggendorf, Germany.
Francisco Luis CasnatiDepartment of Neurosurgery and Interventional Neuroradiology, Donau Isar Klinikum Deggendorf, Perlasberger Str. 41, 94469 Deggendorf, Germany.
Mária VojtkováDepartment of Statistics, Faculty of Economic Informatics, University of Economics in Bratislava, Dolnozemská Cesta 1/b, Bratislava 85235, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0001-6257-901X
Philipp KirschDepartment of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, Donau Isar Klinikum Deggendorf, Perlasberger Str. 41, 94469 Deggendorf, Germany.
Stefan RathDepartment of Neurosurgery and Interventional Neuroradiology, Donau Isar Klinikum Deggendorf, Perlasberger Str. 41, 94469 Deggendorf, Germany.
František CharvátDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Military University Hospital, U Vojenské Nemocnice 1200, 16902 Praha, Czech Republic.
Deggendorf Institute of Technology · DECharles University · CZBratislava University of Economics and Business · SK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndovascular treatment of patients with chronic subdural hematoma using middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization could become an alternative to surgical hematoma evacuation. The aim of the study was to compare methods and identify parameters to help determine the correct treatment modality.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 142 cases conducted internally; 78 were treated surgically and 64 were treated using MMA embolization. We analyzed the treatment failure rate and complications, and using a binary logistic regression model, we identified treatment failure risk factors.

resultsWe found a comparable treatment failure rate of 23.1% for the surgery group and 21.9% for the MMA embolization group. However, in the MMA embolization group, 11 cases showed treatment failure due to early neurological worsening with a need for concomitant surgery. We also found a recurrence of hematoma in 15.4% of cases in the surgery group and 6.3% of cases in the MMA embolization group.

conclusionBoth modalities have their advantages; however, correct identification is crucial for treatment success. According to our findings, hematomas with a maximal width of <18 mm, a midline shift of <5 mm, and no acute or subacute (hyperdense) hematoma could be treated with MMA embolization. Hematomas with a maximal width of >18 mm, a midline shift of >5 mm, and no membranous segmentation could have better outcomes after surgical treatment.

Indexed as

burr hole trepanationcraniotomyembolizationendovascular treatmentmiddle meningeal arterysubdural hematomasurgerytreatment failure

Identifiers

PMID38132975
PMCPMC10745991
OpenAlexW4389385053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.