Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38132904›Full record

ArticleMembranes2023

Permeation Flux Prediction of Vacuum Membrane Distillation Using Hybrid Machine Learning Techniques.

Bashar H Ismael, Faidhalrahman Khaleel, Salah S Ibrahim, Samraa R Khaleel, Mohamed Khalid AlOmar, Adil Masood, Mustafa M Aljumaily, Qusay F Alsalhy, Siti Fatin Mohd Razali, Raed A Al-Juboori and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Membranes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Bashar H IsmaelConstruction and Projects Department, University of Fallujah, Fallujah 31002, Iraq.
Faidhalrahman KhaleelDepartment of Civil Engineering, Al-Maarif University College (AUC), Ramadi 31001, Iraq.ORCID 0000-0001-5943-1321
Salah S IbrahimMembrane Technology Research Unit, Chemical Engineering Department, University of Technology, Alsena'a Street 52, Baghdad 10066, Iraq.ORCID 0000-0003-1569-292X
Samraa R KhaleelMembrane Technology Research Unit, Chemical Engineering Department, University of Technology, Alsena'a Street 52, Baghdad 10066, Iraq.
Mohamed Khalid AlOmarDepartment of Civil Engineering, Al-Maarif University College (AUC), Ramadi 31001, Iraq.ORCID 0000-0001-7008-9416
Adil MasoodDepartment of Civil Engineering, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi 110025, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7017-1604
Mustafa M AljumailyDepartment of Civil Engineering, Al-Maarif University College (AUC), Ramadi 31001, Iraq.ORCID 0000-0003-1825-7835
Qusay F AlsalhyMembrane Technology Research Unit, Chemical Engineering Department, University of Technology, Alsena'a Street 52, Baghdad 10066, Iraq.ORCID 0000-0002-0495-1300
Siti Fatin Mohd RazaliDepartment of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-2757-6141
Raed A Al-JubooriNYUAD Water Research Center, Abu Dhabi Campus, New York University, Abu Dhabi P.O. Box 129188, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0001-6454-3264
Mohammed Majeed HameedDepartment of Civil Engineering, Al-Maarif University College (AUC), Ramadi 31001, Iraq.ORCID 0000-0002-9366-9162
Alanood A AlsarayrehDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Mutah University, P.O. Box 7, Karak 61710, Jordan.ORCID 0000-0002-9524-4221

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vacuum membrane distillation (VMD) has attracted increasing interest for various applications besides seawater desalination. Experimental testing of membrane technologies such as VMD on a pilot or large scale can be laborious and costly. Machine learning techniques can be a valuable tool for predicting membrane performance on such scales. In this work, a novel hybrid model was developed based on incorporating a spotted hyena optimizer (SHO) with support vector machine (SVR) to predict the flux pressure in VMD. The SVR-SHO hybrid model was validated with experimental data and benchmarked against other machine learning tools such as artificial neural networks (ANNs), classical SVR, and multiple linear regression (MLR). The results show that the SVR-SHO predicted flux pressure with high accuracy with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.94. However, other models showed a lower prediction accuracy than SVR-SHO with R-values ranging from 0.801 to 0.902. Global sensitivity analysis was applied to interpret the obtained result, revealing that feed temperature was the most influential operating parameter on flux, with a relative importance score of 52.71 compared to 17.69, 17.16, and 14.44 for feed flowrate, vacuum pressure intensity, and feed concentration, respectively.

Indexed as

desalinationflux pressureglobal sensitivity analysismachine learningspotted hyena optimizervacuum membrane distillation

Identifiers

PMID38132904
PMCPMC10744684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.