ArticleJournal of Intelligence2023
Critical Thinking, Formation, and Change.
Article in Journal of Intelligence, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Critical Thinking to Well-Being: The Metacognitive Pathway in a Graphical-Causal Model.Journal of Intelligence · 2026Article
- The Nature and Measure of Critical Thinking: The PACIER Framework and Assessment.Journal of Intelligence · 2025Article
- Creative and Critical Thinking and Modelling: Confluences and Implications for Science Teaching.Journal of Intelligence · 2025Article
- Article
- An Editorial Introduction to Critical Thinking in Everyday Settings.Journal of Intelligence · 2025Article
- Determining Factors for the Development of Critical Thinking in Higher Education.Journal of Intelligence · 2025Review
- Analysis of the Beliefs About Critical Competence in a Sample of Psychosocial and Socio-Educational Intervention Professionals in Master's Degree Training.Journal of Intelligence · 2025Article
- Critical Thinking and Metacognition: Pathways to Empathy and Psychological Well-Being.Journal of Intelligence · 2025Article
- Cognitive Abilities and School Achievement: Addressing Challenges Across Adolescence.Journal of Intelligence · 2025Article
- Metacognition and Mathematical Modeling Skills: The Mediating Roles of Computational Thinking in High School Students.Journal of Intelligence · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this paper, we propose an application of critical thinking (CT) to real-world problems, taking into account personal well-being (PB) and lifelong formation (FO). First, we raise a substantial problem with CT, which is that causal explanation is of little importance in solving everyday problems. If we care about everyday problems, we must treat the identification of causal relationships as a fundamental mechanism and action as a form of solution once the origin of the problem is unequivocally known. Decision-making and problem-solving skills should be the execution of the causal explanations reached. By acting this way, we change reality and achieve our goals, which are none other than those imposed by our PB. However, to achieve changes or results, we must have these fundamental competencies in CT, and these are not innate; we must acquire and develop them, that is, we must train ourselves to have CT competencies according to the demands of today's world. Finally, in this paper we propose a causal model that seeks to identify and test the causal relationships that exist between the different factors or variables that determine the CT-PB-FO relationship. We present some results on the relevance of causality and how to effectively form and address real-world problems from causality. However, there are still questions to be clarified that need to be investigated in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.