ArticleJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland)2023
An Efficient CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing System for a
Article in Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Unlocking the Potential for Genetic Engineering of the Straw-Degrading MushroomJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Development of a CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing System in DikaryoticJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Integrative Genomic and Transcriptomic Analysis of White-Rot FungiJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Screening of Monokaryotic Strains ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Unraveling bioactive potential and production inChinese herbal medicines · 2025Review
- CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing in Ganoderma lucidum: recent advances and biotechnological opportunities.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025Review
- Gene Editing inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The CRISPR/Cas9 system has become a popular approach to genome editing. Compared with the plasmid-dependent CRISPR system, the ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complex formed by the in vitro assembly of Cas9 and single-guide RNA (sgRNA) has many advantages. However, only a few examples have been reported and the editing efficiency has been relatively low. In this study, we developed and optimized an RNP-mediated CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing system for the monokaryotic strain L1 from the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.