Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38132701›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2023

Enhancing COVID-19 CT Image Segmentation: A Comparative Study of Attention and Recurrence in UNet Models.

Rossana Buongiorno, Giulio Del Corso, Danila Germanese, Leonardo Colligiani, Lorenzo Python, Chiara Romei, Sara Colantonio

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. ANN uncertainty estimates in assessing fatty liver content from ultrasound data.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rossana BuongiornoInstitute of Information Science and Technologies, National Research Council of Italy (ISTI-CNR), 56124 Pisa, PI, Italy.ORCID 0009-0001-5190-0223
Giulio Del CorsoInstitute of Information Science and Technologies, National Research Council of Italy (ISTI-CNR), 56124 Pisa, PI, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4604-2006
Danila GermaneseInstitute of Information Science and Technologies, National Research Council of Italy (ISTI-CNR), 56124 Pisa, PI, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7814-5280
Leonardo ColligianiDepartment of Translational Research, Academic Radiology, University of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, PI, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6217-4933
Lorenzo Python2nd Radiology Unit, Pisa University Hospital, 56124 Pisa, PI, Italy.
Chiara Romei2nd Radiology Unit, Pisa University Hospital, 56124 Pisa, PI, Italy.
Sara ColantonioInstitute of Information Science and Technologies, National Research Council of Italy (ISTI-CNR), 56124 Pisa, PI, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2022-0804
Istituto di Scienza e Tecnologie dell'Informazione "Alessandro Faedo" · ITUniversity of Pisa · IT

Funding

Regione Toscana Bando Ricerca Covid 19 RT - OPTIMISED
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Imaging plays a key role in the clinical management of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as the imaging findings reflect the pathological process in the lungs. The visual analysis of High-Resolution Computed Tomography of the chest allows for the differentiation of parenchymal abnormalities of COVID-19, which are crucial to be detected and quantified in order to obtain an accurate disease stratification and prognosis. However, visual assessment and quantification represent a time-consuming task for radiologists. In this regard, tools for semi-automatic segmentation, such as those based on Convolutional Neural Networks, can facilitate the detection of pathological lesions by delineating their contour. In this work, we compared four state-of-the-art Convolutional Neural Networks based on the encoder-decoder paradigm for the binary segmentation of COVID-19 infections after training and testing them on 90 HRCT volumetric scans of patients diagnosed with COVID-19 collected from the database of the Pisa University Hospital. More precisely, we started from a basic model, the well-known UNet, then we added an attention mechanism to obtain an Attention-UNet, and finally we employed a recurrence paradigm to create a Recurrent-Residual UNet (R2-UNet). In the latter case, we also added attention gates to the decoding path of an R2-UNet, thus designing an R2-Attention UNet so as to make the feature representation and accumulation more effective. We compared them to gain understanding of both the cognitive mechanism that can lead a neural model to the best performance for this task and the good compromise between the amount of data, time, and computational resources required. We set up a five-fold cross-validation and assessed the strengths and limitations of these models by evaluating the performances in terms of Dice score, Precision, and Recall defined both on 2D images and on the entire 3D volume. From the results of the analysis, it can be concluded that Attention-UNet outperforms the other models by achieving the best performance of 81.93%, in terms of 2D Dice score, on the test set. Additionally, we conducted statistical analysis to assess the performance differences among the models. Our findings suggest that integrating the recurrence mechanism within the UNet architecture leads to a decline in the model's effectiveness for our particular application.

Indexed as

attention mechanismconvolutional neural networksCOVID-19deep learningrecurrencysegmentationUNet

Identifiers

PMID38132701
PMCPMC10744014
OpenAlexW4389882790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.