ArticleJournal of imaging2023
Innovative Bacterial Colony Detection: Leveraging Multi-Feature Selection with the Improved Salp Swarm Algorithm.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this paper, we introduce a new and advanced multi-feature selection method for bacterial classification that uses the salp swarm algorithm (SSA). We improve the SSA's performance by using opposition-based learning (OBL) and a local search algorithm (LSA). The proposed method has three main stages, which automate the categorization of bacteria based on their unique characteristics. The method uses a multi-feature selection approach augmented by an enhanced version of the SSA. The enhancements include using OBL to increase population diversity during the search process and LSA to address local optimization problems. The improved salp swarm algorithm (ISSA) is designed to optimize multi-feature selection by increasing the number of selected features and improving classification accuracy. We compare the ISSA's performance to that of several other algorithms on ten different test datasets. The results show that the ISSA outperforms the other algorithms in terms of classification accuracy on three datasets with 19 features, achieving an accuracy of 73.75%. Additionally, the ISSA excels at determining the optimal number of features and producing a better fit value, with a classification error rate of 0.249. Therefore, the ISSA method is expected to make a significant contribution to solving feature selection problems in bacterial analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.