Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38132557›Full record

ReviewBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Bone Regeneration Induced by Patient-Adapted Mg Alloy-Based Scaffolds for Bone Defects: Present and Future Perspectives.

Veronica Manescu Paltanea, Iulian Antoniac, Aurora Antoniac, Dan Laptoiu, Gheorghe Paltanea, Robert Ciocoiu, Iosif Vasile Nemoianu, Lucian Gheorghe Gruionu, Horatiu Dura

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. [Advances in biodegradable medical magnesium alloys for orthopedic applications].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. A hierarchical MgFBioactive materials · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Veronica Manescu PaltaneaFaculty of Material Science and Engineering, National University of Science and Technology Politehnica Bucharest, 313 Splaiul Independentei, District 6, RO-060042 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-2535-5698
Iulian AntoniacFaculty of Material Science and Engineering, National University of Science and Technology Politehnica Bucharest, 313 Splaiul Independentei, District 6, RO-060042 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-0112-3494
Aurora AntoniacFaculty of Material Science and Engineering, National University of Science and Technology Politehnica Bucharest, 313 Splaiul Independentei, District 6, RO-060042 Bucharest, Romania.
Dan LaptoiuDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma I, Colentina Clinical Hospital, 19-21 Soseaua Stefan cel Mare, RO-020125 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-8433-5673
Gheorghe PaltaneaFaculty of Electrical Engineering, National University of Science and Technology Politehnica Bucharest, 313 Splaiul Independentei, District 6, RO-060042 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-3251-7146
Robert CiocoiuFaculty of Material Science and Engineering, National University of Science and Technology Politehnica Bucharest, 313 Splaiul Independentei, District 6, RO-060042 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-2333-0099
Iosif Vasile NemoianuFaculty of Electrical Engineering, National University of Science and Technology Politehnica Bucharest, 313 Splaiul Independentei, District 6, RO-060042 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-5610-8318
Lucian Gheorghe GruionuFaculty of Mechanics, University of Craiova, 13 Alexandru Ioan Cuza, RO-200585 Craiova, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-4526-0864
Horatiu DuraFaculty of Medicine, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, RO-550169 Sibiu, Romania.
Universitatea Națională de Știință și Tehnologie Politehnica București · ROAcademia Oamenilor de Știință din România · ROLucian Blaga University of Sibiu · ROSpitalul Clinic Colentina · ROUniversity of Craiova · RO

Funding

National Program for Research of the National Association of Technical Universities GNAC ARUT 2023 (Project number 29/9.10.2023, Project ID 220235050)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment of bone defects resulting after tumor surgeries, accidents, or non-unions is an actual problem linked to morbidity and the necessity of a second surgery and often requires a critical healthcare cost. Although the surgical technique has changed in a modern way, the treatment outcome is still influenced by patient age, localization of the bone defect, associated comorbidities, the surgeon approach, and systemic disorders. Three-dimensional magnesium-based scaffolds are considered an important step because they can have precise bone defect geometry, high porosity grade, anatomical pore shape, and mechanical properties close to the human bone. In addition, magnesium has been proven in in vitro and in vivo studies to influence bone regeneration and new blood vessel formation positively. In this review paper, we describe the magnesium alloy's effect on bone regenerative processes, starting with a short description of magnesium's role in the bone healing process, host immune response modulation, and finishing with the primary biological mechanism of magnesium ions in angiogenesis and osteogenesis by presenting a detailed analysis based on a literature review. A strategy that must be followed when a patient-adapted scaffold dedicated to bone tissue engineering is proposed and the main fabrication technologies are combined, in some cases with artificial intelligence for Mg alloy scaffolds, are presented with examples. We emphasized the microstructure, mechanical properties, corrosion behavior, and biocompatibility of each study and made a basis for the researchers who want to start to apply the regenerative potential of magnesium-based scaffolds in clinical practice. Challenges, future directions, and special potential clinical applications such as osteosarcoma and persistent infection treatment are present at the end of our review paper.

Indexed as

additive manufacturingangiogenesisartificial intelligencebone defectbone regenerationmanufacturing technologyMg-based scaffoldosteogenesispatient-adapted strategy

Identifiers

PMID38132557
PMCPMC10742271
OpenAlexW4389890770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.