Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38132554›Full record

ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

MLBRSA: Multi-Learning-Based Reptile Search Algorithm for Global Optimization and Software Requirement Prioritization Problems.

Jeyaganesh Kumar Kailasam, Rajkumar Nalliah, Saravanakumar Nallagoundanpalayam Muthusamy, Premkumar Manoharan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jeyaganesh Kumar KailasamDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science, M. Kumarasamy College of Engineering, Karur 639113, Tamilnadu, India.
Rajkumar NalliahDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, KGiSL Institute of Technology, Coimbatore 641035, Tamilnadu, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7980-6730
Saravanakumar Nallagoundanpalayam MuthusamyDepartment of Information Technology, Karpagam College of Engineering, Coimbatore 641032, Tamilnadu, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6017-5115
Premkumar ManoharanDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Dayananda Sagar College of Engineering, Bangalore 560078, Karnataka, India.ORCID 0000-0003-1032-4634

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the realm of computational problem-solving, the search for efficient algorithms tailored for real-world engineering challenges and software requirement prioritization is relentless. This paper introduces the Multi-Learning-Based Reptile Search Algorithm (MLBRSA), a novel approach that synergistically integrates Q-learning, competitive learning, and adaptive learning techniques. The essence of multi-learning lies in harnessing the strengths of these individual learning paradigms to foster a more robust and versatile search mechanism. Q-learning brings the advantage of reinforcement learning, enabling the algorithm to make informed decisions based on past experiences. On the other hand, competitive learning introduces an element of competition, ensuring that the best solutions are continually evolving and adapting. Lastly, adaptive learning ensures the algorithm remains flexible, adjusting the traditional Reptile Search Algorithm (RSA) parameters. The application of the MLBRSA to numerical benchmarks and a few real-world engineering problems demonstrates its ability to find optimal solutions in complex problem spaces. Furthermore, when applied to the complicated task of software requirement prioritization, MLBRSA showcases its capability to rank requirements effectively, ensuring that critical software functionalities are addressed promptly. Based on the results obtained, the MLBRSA stands as evidence of the potential of multi-learning, offering a promising solution to engineering and software-centric challenges. Its adaptability, competitiveness, and experience-driven approach make it a valuable tool for researchers and practitioners.

Indexed as

adaptive learningcompetitive learningmulti-learning-based reptile search algorithm (MLBRSA)optimizationQ-learningsoftware requirement prioritization

Identifiers

PMID38132554
PMCPMC10741723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.