ArticleCurrent issues in molecular biology2023
Development of the RF-GSEA Method for Identifying Disulfidptosis-Related Genes and Application in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Article in Current issues in molecular biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Disulfidptosis: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic targets.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
- Interaction between Regulated Cell Death Pathways and Core Cellular Processes: Unraveling the Molecular Mechanisms of Cardiotoxicity of Antitumor Drugs.Current treatment options in oncology · 2026Review
- Disulfidptosis-related genes RPN1 inhibits the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma by regulating cell cycle, may be a new therapeutic targets.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2025Article
- Constructing a disulfidptosis-related prognostic signature of hepatocellular carcinoma based on single-cell sequencing and weighted co-expression network analysis.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Disulfidptosis is a newly discovered cellular programmed cell death mode. Presently, a considerable number of genes related to disulfidptosis remain undiscovered, and its significance in hepatocellular carcinoma remains unrevealed. We have developed a powerful analytical method called RF-GSEA for identifying potential genes associated with disulfidptosis. This method draws inspiration from gene regulation networks and graph theory, and it is implemented through a combination of random forest regression model and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis. Subsequently, to validate the practical application value of this method, we applied it to hepatocellular carcinoma. Based on the RF-GSEA method, we developed a disulfidptosis-related signature. Lastly, we looked into how the disulfidptosis-related signature is connected to HCC prognosis, the tumor microenvironment, the effectiveness of immunotherapy, and the sensitivity of chemotherapy drugs. The RF-GSEA method identified a total of 220 disulfidptosis-related genes, from which 7 were selected to construct the disulfidptosis-related signature. The high-disulfidptosis-related score group had a worse prognosis compared to the low-disulfidptosis-related score group and showed lower infiltration levels of immune-promoting cells. The high-disulfidptosis-related score group had a higher likelihood of benefiting from immunotherapy compared to the low-disulfidptosis-related score group. The RF-GSEA method is a powerful tool for identifying disulfidptosis-related genes. The disulfidptosis-related signature effectively predicts HCC prognosis, immunotherapy response, and drug sensitivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.