Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38132407›Full record

ReviewDentistry journal2023

In Vitro Models Used in the Formation of Root Caries Lesions-A Review of the Literature.

Zaid Dohan, Lara T Friedlander, Paul R Cooper, Kai-Chun Li, Jithendra T Ratnayake, May L Mei

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Dentistry journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zaid DohanSir John Walsh Research Institute, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand.
Lara T FriedlanderSir John Walsh Research Institute, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-0779-8479
Paul R CooperSir John Walsh Research Institute, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-1305-7287
Kai-Chun LiSir John Walsh Research Institute, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-5411-3065
Jithendra T RatnayakeSir John Walsh Research Institute, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-8534-4472
May L MeiSir John Walsh Research Institute, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-7745-257X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The management of root caries remains a challenge for clinicians due to its unique anatomical location and structure. There is increasing interest in utilising artificial root caries lesions to develop new strategies for remineralisation. An ideal protocol has not yet been agreed upon. The aim of this review is to provide a structured overview of previously reported in vitro root caries models. The literature was screened and mined for information mainly on substrate selection, model systems utilised, and variables used in the models. Human roots (60%) were the most frequently used substrates, followed by bovine roots (40%). Chemical models (69%) were the most frequently utilised model systems, followed by microbiological models (27%), to form root caries lesions. Acetate buffer solution (80%), pH 5.0 or above (40%), and a demineralisation time of five days (25%) were the common variables used in the chemical systems, while mono-species biofilm was most frequently used (73%) in microbiological models and

Indexed as

cementumdemineralisationdentinein vitroremineralisationroot caries lesion

Identifiers

PMID38132407
PMCPMC10743092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.