ReviewBiology2023
New Frontiers in
Review in Biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- CRISPR-Cas12a diagnostics forAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Current Challenges and Long-Term Outcomes in Corneal Transplantation in Infectious Keratitis-A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Neuroprotectin D1 regulating the inflammation and nerve restoration inInternational journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Silver(I)-NHC Complexes as Dual-Action Agents Against PathogenicInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Article
- The Antimicrobial Efficacy of Amine-Containing Surfactants Against Cysts and Trophozoites ofMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Acanthamoeba keratitis: from pathophysiology to prevention, a contemporary clinical perspective.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2025Review
- The pathogenesis, risk factors, diagnosis and treatment of Acanthamoeba keratitis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Review
- Anterior segment optical coherence tomography: a tool for infectious keratitis.Therapeutic advances in ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.