Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38132300›Full record

ArticleBiology2023

Multipotent Mesenchymal Cells Homing and Differentiation on Poly(ε-caprolactone) Blended with 20% Tricalcium Phosphate and Polylactic Acid Incorporating 10% Hydroxyapatite 3D-Printed Scaffolds via a Commercial Fused Deposition Modeling 3D Device.

Nicola De Angelis, Andrea Amaroli, Alberto Lagazzo, Fabrizio Barberis, Pier Raffaele Zarro, Alessia Cappelli, Maria Giovanna Sabbieti, Dimitrios Agas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicola De AngelisDepartment of Surgical and Diagnostic Sciences (DISC), Unit of Implant and Prosthodontics, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8622-4328
Andrea AmaroliDepartment of Earth, Environmental and Life Sciences (DISTAV), University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0494-7942
Alberto LagazzoDepartment of Civil, Chemical and Environmental Engineering (DICCA), University of Genoa, 16100 Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4839-5913
Fabrizio BarberisDepartment of Civil, Chemical and Environmental Engineering (DICCA), University of Genoa, 16100 Genoa, Italy.
Pier Raffaele ZarroSchool of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, 62032 Camerino, Italy.
Alessia CappelliSchool of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, 62032 Camerino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4553-9360
Maria Giovanna SabbietiSchool of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, 62032 Camerino, Italy.
Dimitrios AgasSchool of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, 62032 Camerino, Italy.
Università di Camerino · ITUniversity of Genoa · ITUniversitas Trisakti · ID

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As highlighted by the 'Global Burden of Disease Study 2019' conducted by the World Health Organization, ensuring fair access to medical care through affordable and targeted treatments remains crucial for an ethical global healthcare system. Given the escalating demand for advanced and urgently needed solutions in regenerative bone procedures, the critical role of biopolymers emerges as a paramount necessity, offering a groundbreaking avenue to address pressing medical needs and revolutionize the landscape of bone regeneration therapies. Polymers emerge as excellent solutions due to their versatility, making them reliable materials for 3D printing. The development and widespread adoption of this technology would impact production costs and enhance access to related healthcare services. For instance, in dentistry, the use of commercial polymers blended with β-tricalcium phosphate (TCP) is driven by the need to print a standardized product with osteoconductive features. However, modernization is required to bridge the gap between biomaterial innovation and the ability to print them through commercial printing devices. Here we showed, for the first time, the metabolic behavior and the lineage commitment of bone marrow-derived multipotent mesenchymal cells (MSCs) on the 3D-printed substrates poly(e-caprolactone) combined with 20% tricalcium phosphate (PCL + 20% β-TCP) and L-polylactic acid (PLLA) combined with 10% hydroxyapatite (PLLA + 10% HA). Although there are limitations in printing additive-enriched polymers with a predictable and short half-life, the tested 3D-printed biomaterials were highly efficient in supporting osteoinductivity. Indeed, considering different temporal sequences, both 3D-printed biomaterials resulted as optimal scaffolds for MSCs' commitment toward mature bone cells. Of interest, PLLA + 10% HA substrates hold the confirmation as the finest material for osteoinduction of MSCs.

Indexed as

3D printingadditive manufacturingbiopolymermesenchymal stem cellsosteoinductive factorspersonalized medicine

Identifiers

PMID38132300
PMCPMC10740731
OpenAlexW4389084621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.