Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38132228›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

The Development and Validation of an AI Diagnostic Model for Sacroiliitis: A Deep-Learning Approach.

Kyu-Hong Lee, Ro-Woon Lee, Kyung-Hee Lee, Won Park, Seong-Ryul Kwon, Mie-Jin Lim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kyu-Hong LeeDepartment of Radiology, College of Medicine, Inha University, Incheon 22212, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1069-0810
Ro-Woon LeeDepartment of Radiology, College of Medicine, Inha University, Incheon 22212, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8678-8059
Kyung-Hee LeeDepartment of Radiology, College of Medicine, Inha University, Incheon 22212, Republic of Korea.
Won ParkDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Inha University, Incheon 22212, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0004-8034
Seong-Ryul KwonDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Inha University, Incheon 22212, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1262-2790
Mie-Jin LimDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Inha University, Incheon 22212, Republic of Korea.
Inha University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSacroiliitis refers to the inflammatory condition of the sacroiliac joints, frequently causing lower back pain. It is often associated with systemic conditions. However, its signs on radiographic images can be subtle, which may result in it being overlooked or underdiagnosed. This study aims to utilize artificial intelligence (AI) to create a diagnostic tool for more accurate sacroiliitis detection in radiological images, with the goal of optimizing treatment plans and improving patient outcomes. MATERIALS AND

methodThe study included 492 patients who visited our hospital. Right sacroiliac joint films were independently evaluated by two musculoskeletal radiologists using the Modified New York criteria (Normal, Grades 1-4). A consensus reading resolved disagreements. The images were preprocessed with Z-score standardization and histogram equalization. The DenseNet121 algorithm, a convolutional neural network with 201 layers, was used for learning and classification. All steps were performed on the DEEP:PHI platform.

resultThe AI model exhibited high accuracy across different grades: 94.53% (Grade 1), 95.83% (Grade 2), 98.44% (Grade 3), 96.88% (Grade 4), and 96.09% (Normal cases). Sensitivity peaked at Grade 3 and Normal cases (100%), while Grade 4 achieved perfect specificity (100%). PPVs ranged from 82.61% (Grade 1) to 100% (Grade 4), and NPVs peaked at 100% for Grade 3 and Normal cases. The F1 scores ranged from 64.41% (Grade 1) to 95.38% (Grade 3).

conclusionsThe AI diagnostic model showcased a robust performance in detecting and grading sacroiliitis, reflecting its potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy in clinical settings. By facilitating earlier and more accurate diagnoses, this model could substantially impact treatment strategies and patient outcomes.

Indexed as

deep-learning-based diagnostic toolDEEP:PHIsacroiliitis

Identifiers

PMID38132228
PMCPMC10743277
OpenAlexW4389617890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.