Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38131819›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2023

The Role of In-Group and Out-Group Facial Feedback in Implicit Rule Learning.

Meijun Ou, Wenjie Peng, Wenyang Zhang, Muxin Ouyang, Yiling Liu, Keming Lu, Xiangyan Zeng, Jie Yuan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The influences of emotional factors on head and neck cancer patients' physical activity behavior in China: an application of the extended theory of planned behavior.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Meijun OuSchool of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China.
Wenjie PengSchool of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China.
Wenyang ZhangSchool of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China.
Muxin OuyangPsychology Department, Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866, USA.
Yiling LiuSchool of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China.
Keming LuSchool of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China.
Xiangyan ZengSchool of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China.
Jie YuanSchool of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China.

Funding

the National Natural Science Foundation of China 62007009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Implicit learning refers to the fact that people acquire new knowledge (structures or rules) without conscious awareness. Previous studies have shown that implicit learning is affected by feedback. However, few studies have investigated the role of social feedback in implicit learning concretely. Here, we conducted two experiments to explore how in-group and out-group facial feedback impact different difficulty levels of implicit rule learning. In Experiment 1, the Chinese participants in each group could only see one type of facial feedback, i.e., either in-group (East Asian) or out-group (Western) faces, and learned the implicit rule through happy and sad facial expressions. The only difference between Experiment 2 and Experiment 1 was that the participants saw both the in-group and out-group faces before group assignment to strengthen the contrast between the two group identities. The results showed that only in Experiment 2 but not Experiment 1 was there a significant interaction effect in the accuracy of tasks between the difficulty levels and groups. For the lowest difficulty level, the learning accuracy of the in-group facial feedback group was significantly higher than that of the out-group facial feedback group, whereas this did not happen at the two highest levels of difficulty. In conclusion, when the contrast of group identities was highlighted, out-group feedback reduced the accuracy of the least difficult task; on the contrary, there was no accuracy difference between out-group and in-group feedback conditions. These findings have extensively important implications for our understanding of implicit learning and improving teaching achievement in the context of educational internationalization.

Indexed as

facial expressionimplicit learningin-groupout-groupsocial feedback

Identifiers

PMID38131819
PMCPMC10741090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.