Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38131810›Full record

ArticleAudiology research2023

Exploring Electrode Placements to Optimize the Identification and Measurement of Early Auditory Evoked Potentials.

Kailyn A McFarlane, Jason Tait Sanchez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Audiology research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Developing a Calibration Method to Minimize Variability in Auditory Evoked Potentials.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kailyn A McFarlaneRoxelyn and Richard Pepper Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-1758-2520
Jason Tait SanchezRoxelyn and Richard Pepper Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0115-846X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cochlear synaptic loss (termed cochlear synaptopathy) has been suggested to contribute to suprathreshold hearing difficulties. However, its existence and putative effects in humans remain inconclusive, largely due to the heterogeneous methods used across studies to indirectly evaluate the health of cochlear synapses. There is a need to standardize proxies of cochlear synaptopathy to appropriately compare and interpret findings across studies. Early auditory evoked potentials (AEPs), including the compound action potential (AP)/Wave I of the auditory brainstem response are a popular proxy, yet remain variable based on technical considerations. This study evaluated one such consideration-electrode array (i.e., montage)-to optimize the use of early AEP waveforms. In 35 young adults, electrocochleography (ECochG) responses were collected using vertical and horizontal montages. Standard ECochG measures and AP/Wave I and Wave II peak-to-trough amplitudes and latencies were compared between montages. Vertical montage recordings consistently produced significantly larger AP/Wave I peak-to-trough amplitudes compared to horizontal recordings. These findings support the use of a vertical electrode montage for optimal recordings of peripheral cochlear nerve activity. As cochlear synaptopathy continues to be explored in humans, the methods highlighted here should be considered in the development of a standardized assessment.

Indexed as

auditory brainstem responseauditory evoked potentialscochlear synaptopathycompound action potentialelectrocochleographyelectrode placement

Identifiers

PMID38131810
PMCPMC10740558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.