Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38131681›Full record

ArticleClinics and practice2023

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures of Flapless Corticotomy with Low-Level Laser Therapy in En Masse Retraction of Upper Anterior Teeth: A Three-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial.

Mudar M Mousa, Mohammad Y Hajeer, Ahmad S Burhan, Khaldoun M A Darwich, Wael H Almahdi, Ossama Aljabban, Mohammed A Awawdeh, Imad Addin Almasri

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinics and practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06875037 nacompletednot on this map

Patient-reported Outcomes of Accelerated Upper Canine Retraction With Low-amperage Electrical Stimulation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorDamascus UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled40ConditionsClass II Division 1 MalocclusionArmsElectric stimulation removable appliance, Traditional orthodontic fixed appliance without accleration
NCT07442825 nacompletednot on this map

Evaluation of the Effects of Low-Level Laser Therapy Combined With Piezocision vs. Piezocision Alone on External Apical Root Resorption and Periodontal Indices Following the En-Masse Retraction of Upper Anterior Teeth: A Three-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorDamascus UniversityRan2023 to 2025Enrolled66ConditionsMalocclusion, Angle Class II, Division 1ArmsFlapless Corticotomy (Piezocision), Level Laser Therapy (LLLT), Traditional treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mudar M MousaDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Damascus, Damascus P.O. Box 30621, Syria.
Mohammad Y HajeerDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Damascus, Damascus P.O. Box 30621, Syria.ORCID 0000-0003-0640-1297
Ahmad S BurhanDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Damascus, Damascus P.O. Box 30621, Syria.
Khaldoun M A DarwichDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Damascus, Damascus P.O. Box 30621, Syria.
Wael H AlmahdiDepartment of Periodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Damascus, Damascus P.O. Box 30621, Syria.
Ossama AljabbanDepartment of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus University, Damascus P.O. Box 30621, Syria.
Mohammed A AwawdehPreventive Dental Science Department, College of Dentistry, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS), Riyadh 11426, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-6242-1797
Imad Addin AlmasriDepartment of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Economics, Damascus University, Damascus P.O. Box 30621, Syria.ORCID 0000-0002-4741-3721
Damascus University · SYKing Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences · SA

Funding

Damascus University 23654267DEJ
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: This study aimed to compare patient-reported outcome measures when accelerating en masse retraction between the piezocision procedure and the subsequent application of low-level laser therapy (FC+LLLT), with the piezocision alone (FC), and in a control group. (2) Methods: A three-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted involving 60 patients (41 females and 19 males) with Class II division I malocclusion. The en masse retraction was performed using NiTi closed coil springs attached to miniscrews. The LLLT was performed using an 808 nm Ga-Al-As diode laser. Patient responses regarding pain, discomfort, swelling, and chewing difficulties were reported at ten assessment points. (3) Results: The greatest pain levels were observed 24 h after the application of force during the first and third months of retraction. The mean pain, discomfort, swelling, and chewing difficulties were significantly smaller in the control group than in the FC and FC+LLLT groups. High satisfaction levels were reported in all three groups (

Indexed as

discomforten masse retractionLLLTmini-implantspainpeizocision

Identifiers

PMID38131681
PMCPMC10742166
OpenAlexW4388912336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.