Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38131357›Full record

ArticleJournal of global health2023

Receive, Sustain, and Flow: A simple heuristic for facilitating the identification and treatment of critically ill patients during their hospital journeys.

Jacob McKnight, Tamara Mulenga Willows, Jacquie Oliwa, Onesmus Onyango, Elibariki Mkumbo, John Maiba, Karima Khalid, Carl Otto Schell, Tim Baker, Mike English

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of global health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Jacob McKnight *Health Systems Collaborative, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK.
Tamara Mulenga Willows *Health Systems Collaborative, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK.
Jacquie OliwaHealth Services Unit, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.
Onesmus OnyangoHealth Services Unit, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.
Elibariki MkumboDepartment of Health Systems, Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
John MaibaDepartment of Health Systems, Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Karima KhalidDepartment of Health Systems, Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Carl Otto SchellDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Tim BakerDepartment of Health Systems, Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Mike EnglishHealth Systems Collaborative, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK.
Ifakara Health Institute · TZUniversity of Oxford · GBCenter for Clinical Research Dalarna · SEKenya Medical Research Institute · KELondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity of Nairobi · KE

Funding

Wellcome Trust 207522/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Hospital patients can become critically ill anywhere in a hospital but their survival is affected by problems of identification and adequate, timely, treatment. This is issue of particular concern in lower middle-income countries' (LMICs) hospitals where specialised units are scarce and severely under-resourced. "Cross-sectional" approaches to improving narrow, specific aspects of care will not attend to issues that affect patients' care across the length of their experience. A simpler approach to understanding key issues across the "hospital journey" could help to deliver life-saving treatments to those patients who need it, wherever they are in the facility. Methods: We carried out 31 narrative interviews with frontline health workers in five Kenyan and five Tanzanian hospitals from November 2020 to December 2021 during the COVID-19 pandemic and analysed using a thematic analysis approach. We also followed 12 patient hospital journeys, through the course of treatment of very sick patients admitted to the hospitals we studied. Results: Our research explores gaps in hospital systems that result in lapses in effective, continuous care across the hospital journeys of patients in Tanzania and Kenya. We organise these factors according to the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) approach to patient safety, which we extend to explore how these issues affect patients across the course of care. We discern three repeating, recursive phases we term Receive, Sustain, and Flow. We use this heuristic to show how gaps and weaknesses in service provision affect critically ill patients' hospital journeys. Conclusion: Receive, Sustain, and Flow offers a heuristic for hospital management to identify and ameliorate limitations in human and technical resources for the care of the critically ill.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessPandemicsHeuristicsHospitalsHumansKenya

Identifiers

PMID38131357
PMCPMC10740342
OpenAlexW4390105641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.