ArticleJournal of the American Chemical Society2024
Z-Form Adoption of Nucleic Acid is a Multi-Step Process Which Proceeds through a Melted Intermediate.
Article in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Zα and Zβ domains of ADAR1 and ZBP1 bind G-quadruplexes with nanomolar affinities, establishing Zβ as a G-quadruplex-specific domain.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- ZBP1's Inability to Convert Unmodified RNAs to the Z-form Underlies a Balanced Mechanism of RNA Recognition with ADAR1.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Cromolyn as a novel pharmacophore of the Zα domain of the RNA-editing enzyme ADAR1p150.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025Article
- Mirror-Image RNA: A Right-Handed Z-Form RNA and Its Ligand Complex.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Zα Domain of ADAR1 Binds to an A-Form-like Nucleic Acid Duplex with Low Micromolar Affinity.Biochemistry · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The left-handed Z-conformation of nucleic acids can be adopted by both DNA and RNA when bound by Zα domains found within a variety of innate immune response proteins. Zα domains stabilize this higher-energy conformation by making specific interactions with the unique geometry of Z-DNA/Z-RNA. However, the mechanism by which a right-handed helix contorts to become left-handed in the presence of proteins, including the intermediate steps involved, is poorly understood. Through a combination of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and other biophysical measurements, we have determined that in the absence of Zα, under low salt conditions at room temperature, d(CpG) and r(CpG) constructs show no observable evidence of transient Z-conformations greater than 0.5% on either the intermediate or slow NMR time scales. At higher temperatures, we observed a transient unfolded intermediate. The ease of melting a nucleic acid duplex correlates with Z-form adoption rates in the presence of Zα. The largest contributing factor to the activation energies of Z-form adoption as calculated by Arrhenius plots is the ease of flipping the sugar pucker, as required for Z-DNA and Z-RNA. Together, these data validate the previously proposed "zipper model" for Z-form adoption in the presence of Zα. Overall, Z-conformations are more likely to be adopted by double-stranded DNA and RNA regions flanked by less stable regions and by RNAs experiencing torsional/mechanical stress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.