Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38131305›Full record

ArticleBioscience reports2023

Biological and mutational analyses of CXCR4-antagonist interactions and design of new antagonistic analogs.

Qian Meng, Ruohan Zhu, Yujia Mao, Siyu Zhu, Yi Wu, Lina S M Huang, Aaron Ciechanover, Jing An, Yan Xu, Ziwei Huang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioscience reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Structural mechanisms underlying the modulation of CXCR4 by diverse small-molecule antagonists.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Qian MengSchool of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Ruohan ZhuSchool of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Yujia MaoSchool of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Siyu ZhuSchool of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Yi WuSchool of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Lina S M HuangDivision of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Heath, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California at San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, U.S.A.
Aaron CiechanoverThe Rapport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 3109601, Israel.
Jing AnDivision of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Heath, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California at San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, U.S.A.
Yan XuCiechanover Institute of Precision and Regenerative Medicine, School of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen 518172, China.
Ziwei HuangSchool of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5459-1211
Tsinghua University · CNUniversity of California San Diego · USChinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen · CNTechnion – Israel Institute of Technology · IL

Funding

STRUCTURES AND INTERACTIONS OF CHEMOKINE RECEPTORSR01GM057761 · NIGMS · UPSTATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY · PI AN, JING, HUANG, ZIWEI · 1998 to 2025
$5.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM057761
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The chemokine receptor CXCR4 has become an attractive therapeutic target for HIV-1 infection, hematopoietic stem cell mobilization, and cancer metastasis. A wide variety of synthetic antagonists of CXCR4 have been developed and studied for a growing list of clinical applications. To compare the biological effects of different antagonists on CXCR4 functions and their common and/or distinctive molecular interactions with the receptor, we conducted head-to-head comparative cell-based biological and mutational analyses of the interactions with CXCR4 of eleven reported antagonists, including HC4319, DV3, DV1, DV1 dimer, V1, vMIP-II, CVX15, LY2510924, IT1t, AMD3100, and AMD11070 that were representative of different structural classes of D-peptides, L-peptide, natural chemokine, cyclic peptides, and small molecules. The results were rationalized by molecular modeling of CXCR4-antagonist interactions from which the common as well as different receptor binding sites of these antagonists were derived, revealing a number of important residues such as W94, D97, H113, D171, D262, and E288, mostly of negative charge. To further examine this finding, we designed and synthesized new antagonistic analogs by adding positively charged residues Arg to a D-peptide template to enhance the postulated charge-charge interactions. The newly designed analogs displayed significantly increased binding to CXCR4, which supports the notion that negatively charged residues of CXCR4 can engage in interactions with moieties of positive charge of the antagonistic ligands. The results from these mutational, modeling and new analog design studies shed new insight into the molecular mechanisms of different types of antagonists in recognizing CXCR4 and guide the development of new therapeutic agents.

Indexed as

PeptidesSignal TransductionModels, MolecularReceptors, ChemokineReceptors, CXCR4PeptidesReceptors, ChemokineReceptors, CXCR4chemokine receptor CXCR4drug designligand-receptor interactionsmolecular modelingpeptide antagonistssmall molecule antagonists

Identifiers

PMID38131305
PMCPMC10987480
OpenAlexW4390115880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.