Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38131051›Full record

ReviewF1000Research2022

Current practices of physiotherapists in Switzerland regarding fall risk-assessment for community-dwelling older adults: A national cross-sectional survey.

Morgane Duc, Anne-Gabrielle Mittaz Hager, Damiano Zemp, Guillaume Roulet, Alice Bridel, Roger Hilfiker

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in F1000Research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Morgane DucDepartment of Health Professions, Bern University of Applied Sciences, Bern, Bern, 3008, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6737-634X
Anne-Gabrielle Mittaz HagerSchool of Health Sciences, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, HES-SO Valais-Wallis, Leukerbad, Valais, 3954, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9461-2937
Damiano ZempGeriatric Service, Ospedale Regionale di Mendrisio (EOC), Mendrisio, Ticino, 6850, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4033-9944
Guillaume RouletService of Geriatrics and Geriatric Rehabilitation, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Vaud, 1011, Switzerland.
Alice BridelDepartment of Health Professions, Bern University of Applied Sciences, Bern, Bern, 3008, Switzerland.
Roger HilfikerSchool of Health Sciences, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, HES-SO Valais-Wallis, Leukerbad, Valais, 3954, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8662-6116
Bern University of Applied Sciences · CHHES-SO Valais-Wallis · CHOspedale Regionale di Mendrisio · CHUniversity of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Falls can strongly impact older people's quality of life, health, and lifestyle. Multifactorial assessment can determine an individual's risk of falling as the first step for fall prevention intervention. Physiotherapists have an essential role to play in assessing fall risk by older adults living in the community. In the absence of published data on this topic in Switzerland, this study investigated the current practices of physiotherapists to determine whether those are in line with recommendations. Methods: An anonymous cross-sectional survey was undertaken among physiotherapists practising in Switzerland between the 21st of November and the 31st of December 2020. A priori and exploratory hypotheses were tested. Responses to open-ended questions were grouped into themes for analysis. Results: A total of 938 questionnaires from all three language regions of Switzerland was analysed. Participants worked in different settings, with a higher representation of private practice self-employees (56%). Standardised fall risk assessments or instruments were used by 580 (62%) participants, while 235 (25%) preferred subjective assessment of fall risk only. Differences in fall risk assessment were observed according to the workplace setting (adjusted OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.37 to 2.7) and education level (trend test, p<0.001). The standardised assessments most frequently employed were the Berg Balance Scale (58%), the Timed-Up-and-Go (57%) and the Tinetti Balance Assessment tool (47%). Risk factors for falls were frequently queried, particularly history of falls (88%), home hazards (84%), and functional ability (81%). Technical resources (40%), knowledge (30%), and time (22%) were common barriers to implement a systematic fall risk assessment. Conclusions: This study provides an overview of the current practices of physiotherapists in Switzerland in fall risk assessment. There is still room to optimise the standardisation and systematisation of this assessment to implement a best practice strategy and prevent avoidable falls.

Indexed as

Independent LivingPhysical TherapistsAccidental FallsAgedCross-Sectional StudiesGeriatric AssessmentHumansQuality of LifeRisk AssessmentSwitzerlandAccidental fallsElderlyPreventionRisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID38131051
PMCPMC10733665
OpenAlexW4389550316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.