Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38131016›Full record

ArticleAtmospheric environment (Oxford, England : 1994)2022

Using land use variable information and a random forest approach to correct spatial mean bias in fused CMAQ fields for particulate and gas species.

Niru Senthilkumar, Mark Gilfether, Howard H Chang, Armistead G Russell, James Mulholland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Atmospheric environment (Oxford, England : 1994), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Maternal ambient air pollution exposure and risk of stillbirth in Georgia, USA.Environmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Maternal ambient air pollution exposure and risk of stillbirth in Georgia, USA.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Influencing factors and trend prediction of PMEnvironment, development and sustainability · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Niru SenthilkumarSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA.
Mark GilfetherSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA.
Howard H ChangDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
Armistead G RussellSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA.
James MulhollandSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA.

Funding

Data Integration Methods for Environmental Exposures with Applications to Air Pollution and Asthma MorbidityR01ES027892 · NIEHS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI CHANG, HOWARD H · 2017 to 2021
$2.7M
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES027892
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate spatiotemporal air pollution fields are essential for health impact and epidemiologic studies. There are an increasing number of studies that have combined observational data with spatiotemporally complete air pollution simulations. Land-use, speciated gaseous and particulate pollutant concentrations and chemical transport modeling are fused using a random forest approach to construct daily air quality fields for 12 pollutants (CO, NOx, NO

Indexed as

Air pollutionCMAQGas speciesParticulate speciesRandom forest modelSpatiotemporal pollutant fields

Identifiers

PMID38131016
PMCPMC10735214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.