Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38130900›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology advances

Neuronal differentiation drives the antitumor activity of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibition in glioblastoma.

Sabbir Khan, Emmanuel Martinez-Ledesma, Jianwen Dong, Rajasekaran Mahalingam, Soon Young Park, Yuji Piao, Dimpy Koul, Veerakumar Balasubramaniyan, John F de Groot, W K Alfred Yung

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. MEK Inhibition in Glioblastoma: Current Perspectives and Future Directions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Glioblastoma Therapy: Past, Present and Future.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Sabbir KhanDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Emmanuel Martinez-LedesmaDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Jianwen DongDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Rajasekaran MahalingamDepartment of Symptom Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Soon Young ParkDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Yuji PiaoDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Dimpy KoulDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Veerakumar BalasubramaniyanDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
John F de GrootDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
W K Alfred YungDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tropism Enhanced Oncolytic Adenovirus for the Treatment of Brain TumorsP50CA127001 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Juan Fueyo · 2008 to 2026
$41.2M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA127001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) amplification is found in nearly 40%-50% of glioblastoma cases. Several EGFR inhibitors have been tested in glioblastoma but have failed to demonstrate long-term therapeutic benefit, presumably because of acquired resistance. Targeting EGFR downstream signaling with mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1 and 2 (MEK1/2) inhibitors would be a more effective approach to glioblastoma treatment. We tested the therapeutic potential of MEK1/2 inhibitors in glioblastoma using 3D cultures of glioma stem-like cells (GSCs) and mouse models of glioblastoma. Methods: Several MEK inhibitors were screened in an unbiased high-throughput platform using GSCs. Cell death was evaluated using flow cytometry and Western blotting (WB) analysis. RNA-seq, real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction, immunofluorescence, and WB analysis were used to identify and validate neuronal differentiation. Results: Unbiased screening of multiple MEK inhibitors in GSCs showed antiproliferative and apoptotic cell death in sensitive cell lines. An RNA-seq analysis of cells treated with trametinib, a potent MEK inhibitor, revealed upregulation of neurogenesis and neuronal differentiation genes, such as achaete-scute homolog 1 (ASCL1), delta-like 3 (DLL3), and neurogenic differentiation 4 (NeuroD4). We validated the neuronal differentiation phenotypes in vitro and in vivo using selected differentiation markers (β-III-tubulin, ASCL1, DLL3, and NeuroD4). Oral treatment with trametinib in an orthotopic GSC xenograft model significantly improved animal survival, with 25%-30% of mice being long-term survivors. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrated that MEK1/2 inhibition promotes neuronal differentiation in glioblastoma, a potential additional mechanism of action of MEK1/2 inhibitors. Thus, MEK inhibitors could be efficacious in glioblastoma patients with activated EGFR/MAPK signaling.

Indexed as

apoptosisEGFR-MEK signalingglioblastomaMEK inhibitorsneuronal differentiation

Identifiers

PMID38130900
PMCPMC10734674
OpenAlexW4387579009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.