Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38130870›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular neuroscience2023

Different responses of mice and rats hippocampus CA1 pyramidal neurons to

Paola Vitale, Fabio Librizzi, Andrea C Vaiana, Elisa Capuana, Maurizio Pezzoli, Ying Shi, Armando Romani, Michele Migliore, Rosanna Migliore

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Functional Characterization of a De NovoNeurology. Genetics · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Neuroprotective Effect ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Paola VitaleInstitute of Biophysics, National Research Council, Palermo, Italy.
Fabio LibrizziInstitute of Biophysics, National Research Council, Palermo, Italy.
Andrea C VaianaInstitute of Biophysics, National Research Council, Palermo, Italy.
Elisa CapuanaInstitute of Biophysics, National Research Council, Palermo, Italy.
Maurizio PezzoliLaboratory of Neural Microcircuitry, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Ying ShiLaboratory of Neural Microcircuitry, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Armando RomaniBlue Brain Project, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Campus Biotech, Geneva, Switzerland.
Michele MiglioreInstitute of Biophysics, National Research Council, Palermo, Italy.
Rosanna MiglioreInstitute of Biophysics, National Research Council, Palermo, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fundamental role of any neuron within a network is to transform complex spatiotemporal synaptic input patterns into individual output spikes. These spikes, in turn, act as inputs for other neurons in the network. Neurons must execute this function across a diverse range of physiological conditions, often based on species-specific traits. Therefore, it is crucial to determine the extent to which findings can be extrapolated between species and, ultimately, to humans. In this study, we employed a multidisciplinary approach to pinpoint the factors accounting for the observed electrophysiological differences between mice and rats, the two species most used in experimental and computational research. After analyzing the morphological properties of their hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells, we conducted a statistical comparison of rat and mouse electrophysiological features in response to somatic current injections. This analysis aimed to uncover the parameters underlying these distinctions. Using a well-established computational workflow, we created ten distinct single-cell computational models of mouse CA1 pyramidal neurons, ready to be used in a full-scale hippocampal circuit. By comparing their responses to a variety of somatic and synaptic inputs with those of rat models, we generated experimentally testable hypotheses regarding species-specific differences in ion channel distribution, kinetics, and the electrophysiological mechanisms underlying their distinct responses to synaptic inputs during the behaviorally relevant Gamma and Sharp-Wave rhythms.

Indexed as

computational modelingelectrophysiological featureshippocampuspyramidal neuronsrodent comparison

Identifiers

PMID38130870
PMCPMC10733970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.