ArticleNeurology. Genetics2024
Case of Autosomal Dominant Alzheimer Disease With Negative Findings From PiB-PET Examination.
Article in Neurology. Genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endogenously generated Dutch-type Aβ non-fibrillar aggregates dysregulate presynaptic neurotransmission in the absence of detectable inflammation.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- Alzheimer's Amyloid Hypothesis and Antibody Therapy: Melting Glaciers?International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Relationship between efficacy and preferential targeting of soluble Aβ aggregates.Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: This study reports an uncommon case of autosomal dominant Alzheimer disease (AD) with negative PiB-PET findings. Methods: A 55-year-old woman was admitted to the hospital due to a progressive cognitive decline for over 9 years, along with a possible dementia family history. The patient underwent routine laboratory tests, neuropsychological assessments, and neuroimaging examinations. Additionally, the cerebrospinal fluid sample was analyzed for AD biomarkers using the Single Molecular Array (Simoa) technique. A targeted Next-Generation-Sequencing (NGS) panel screening was also conducted. Results: Routine blood and CSF laboratory tests, as well as CSF tap test, yielded negative results. Cranial MRI showed atrophy of the whole brain. PiB-PET scanning indicated that PiB was merely retained in her brain with an overall standard uptake value ratio (SUVR) <1.0. Simoa analysis showed an increase in the level of CSF t-tau and a decrease in that of CSF Aβ42. NGS panel screening detected a c.G2032A (p.D678N) heterozygous mutation in APP. Consequently, the patient was diagnosed with autosomal dominant AD. Discussion: We have reported an uncommon case of autosomal dominant AD carrying p.D678N variant in APP with negative PiB-PET results. The diagnosis of AD should not be directly excluded solely based on the negative PiB-PET results.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.