The use of probabilistic graphical models in pediatric sepsis: a feasibility and scoping review.

Background: Recent research has demonstrated that machine learning (ML) has the potential to improve several aspects of medical application for critical illness, including sepsis. This scoping review aims to evaluate the feasibility of probabilistic graphical model (PGM) methods in pediatric sepsis application and describe the use of pediatric sepsis definition in these studies. Methods: Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL+), and Web of Sciences from 2000-2023. Keywords included "pediatric", "neonates", "infants", "machine learning", "probabilistic graphical model", and "sepsis". Results: A total of 3,244 studies were screened, and 72 were included in this scoping review. Sepsis was defined using positive microbiology cultures in 19 studies (26.4%), followed by the 2005's international pediatric sepsis consensus definition in 11 studies (15.3%), and Sepsis-3 definition in seven studies (9.7%). Other sepsis definitions included: bacterial infection, the international classification of diseases, clinicians' assessment, and antibiotic administration time. Among the most common ML approaches used were logistic regression (n=27), random forest (n=24), and Neural Network (n=18). PGMs were used in 13 studies (18.1%), including Bayesian classifiers (n=10), and the Markov Model (n=3). When applied on the same dataset, PGMs show a relatively inferior performance to other ML models in most cases. Other aspects of explainability and transparency were not examined in these studies. Conclusions: Current studies suggest that the performance of probabilistic graphic models is relatively inferior to other ML methods. However, its explainability and transparency advantages make it a potentially viable method for several pediatric sepsis studies and applications.