Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38130512›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Maxillary Cast Partial Denture and Mandibular Implant-Supported Metal-Ceramic Prosthesis With a Split Framework to Compensate for Mandibular Flexure: A Case Report.

Ananya, Priya Rani, Tushar Sinha, Jayant Prakash

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

AnanyaProsthodontics, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, IND.
Priya RaniProsthodontics, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, IND.
Tushar SinhaProsthodontics, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, IND.
Jayant PrakashDentistry, Sadar Hospital, Muzaffarpur, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of modern dentistry is to restore optimum oral health, function, and comfort for a patient. For an implant-supported fixed prosthesis, these goals cannot be met if the biomechanical factors governing the success of the prosthesis are overlooked. Mandibular flexure is one such factor that needs to be considered, especially when implants are being placed posterior to the interforaminal region. If not, it can lead to problems like increased stress, bone resorption, poor fit of the prosthesis, screw loosening, and patient discomfort. The use of a split-framework prosthesis is one of the measures that could be taken to decrease the stress, ensure a passive fit of the framework, and long-term maintenance of patient comfort and function. This case report describes the oral rehabilitation of a patient using a maxillary cast partial denture and mandibular split framework fixed prosthesis to compensate for mandibular flexure.

Indexed as

cast partial denturedental implantsframework splittingimplant-supported fixed prosthesismandibular flexure

Identifiers

PMID38130512
PMCPMC10733657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.