ArticleThe journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG2023
Comparison of Outcomes in Neonates Receiving Cefepime or Ceftazidime.
Article in The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesCefepime and ceftazidime are alternatives to cefotaxime for management of Gram-negative infections in neonates. The objective was to evaluate neonatal outcomes when receiving cefepime or ceftazidime.
methodsThis was a single center, retrospective analysis of neonates exposed to at least 24 hours of cefepime or ceftazidime between June 1, 2018, and June 1, 2021. The primary outcome was incidence of culture-positive, late-onset sepsis after initial exposure. Secondary outcomes included culture-negative, respiratory, urinary tract, and resistant infections; necrotizing enterocolitis; length of stay; age at discharge; mortality; and adverse effects.
resultsA total of 105 neonates were included (cefepime, n = 50; ceftazidime, n = 55). Baseline characteristics were similar except more cumulative days of antibiotics (25.0 [IQR, 9.3-47.0] versus 9.0 [IQR, 4.0-23.5], p = 0.01), central line days (11.0 [IQR, 6.0-40.0] versus 6.5 [IQR, 0.0-11.5], p = 0.001), and ventilator days (13.0 [IQR, 2.3-48.0] versus 4.0 [IQR, 0.0-25.0], p = 0.02) were found in the cefepime group than in the ceftazidime group. There was no difference in culture-positive sepsis after the initial antibiotic course (8.0% versus 3.6%, p = 0.42). Statistical differences were seen in select secondary outcomes including treated respiratory infections (16.0% versus 1.8%, p = 0.01), length of stay greater than 30 days (72.0% versus 50.9%, p = 0.03), and mortality (26.0% versus 9.1%, p = 0.02). These differences were not observed in analyses adjusted for ventilator days.
conclusionsThis analysis found no difference in culture-positive sepsis in neonates exposed to cefepime versus ceftazidime. Moreover, there were no differences in secondary outcomes in adjusted analyses. Further research is needed to assess neonatal outcomes in a larger analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.