Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38130381›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of plastic surgery2023

Electrodiagnostic Evaluation of Prognostic Factors Influencing the Surgical Outcomes of Upper Extremity Nerve Injuries Caused by Penetrating Trauma: A Cross-sectional Study.

Amin Pahlavani, Nahid Hosseini Nejad Mir, Arian Karimi Rouzbahani, Golnaz Mahmoudvand, Pardis Rezaei, Ali Pahlevani, Mohammad Kazem Shahmoradi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of plastic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 61% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amin PahlavaniDepartment of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran.
Nahid Hosseini Nejad MirDepartment of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran.
Arian Karimi RouzbahaniStudent Research Committee, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran.
Golnaz MahmoudvandUSERN Office, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran.
Pardis RezaeiUSERN Office, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran.
Ali PahlevaniStudent Research Committee, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran.
Mohammad Kazem ShahmoradiDepartment of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran.
Lorestan University of Medical Sciences · IRUniversal Scientific Education and Research Network · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Peripheral nerve damage is a major cause of disability, which can lead to serious limitations in daily and occupational activities. Although primary repair can restore the function of the damaged organ remarkably, factors predicting the prognosis of nerve repair are a topic of constant debate. We aimed to investigate the factors affecting the outcomes of primary nerve repair in patients afflicted by upper extremity nerve injuries following penetrating trauma. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 51 patients referred to Shohada-ye Ashayer Hospital in Khorramabad, Iran, from 2016 to 2021. Data including the patient's age, gender, education, type, severity, and mechanism of injury, the damaged nerve, time and of method repair, the surgeon's specialty, as well as the electrodiagnostic findings, were collected and analyzed using SPSS software version 22. Results: The mean age of the patients was 30.41 ± 12.63 years, and the majority of them (84.3%) were men. A significant relationship was found between the sensory amplitude with education (P=0.002), the type of damaged nerve (P=0.048), and the severity of injury (P=0.012). The positive sharp wave was significantly associated with the surgeon's specialty (P=0.034). Besides, the motor amplitude was considerably related to the patient's age (P=0.040) and the surgeon's specialty (P=0.035). Conclusion: Factors determining the outcome of peripheral nerve repair following penetrating trauma to the upper extremity include age, education, the type of damaged nerve, the severity of the injury, and the surgeon's specialty.

Indexed as

ElectrodiagnosisPenetrating traumaPeripheral nerveUpper extremity

Identifiers

PMID38130381
PMCPMC10732289
OpenAlexW4390120503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.