ArticleThe journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG2023
Comparing the Frequency of Culture-Positive Late Onset Sepsis With the Use of Ceftazidime Versus Cefotaxime in the NICU.
Article in The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveAs broader spectrum antibiotics have been associated with adverse effects, our study evaluated whether the frequency of culture-positive late-onset sepsis (LOS) and multidrug resistant (MDR) infections were increased with the use of ceftazidime as compared with cefotaxime in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).
methodsThis was a multihospital, retrospective chart review of patients who received at least 24 hours of ceftazidime or cefotaxime in the NICU between December 1, 2012 and August 31, 2021. Patients were excluded from analysis if they expired during the admission, had an incomplete history, positive cultures for an MDR infection prior to receiving either antibiotic, or received the alternate antibiotic within the same treatment course.
resultsA total of 334 patients were included for analysis (ceftazidime, n = 147; cefotaxime, n = 187). The average birth weight was lower in the ceftazidime cohort compared with the cefotaxime cohort [1.46 kg (95% CI, 1.29-1.63 kg) versus 1.93 kg (95% CI, 1.75-2.11 kg), p = 0.0002] with a corresponding lower gestational age [28.9 weeks (95% CI, 28.0-29.9 weeks) versus 31.7 weeks (95% CI, 30.8-32.6 weeks), p = 0.0001]. Adjusting for baseline differences showed a protective effect for ceftazidime (OR = 0.32; 95% CI, 0.16-0.62; p = 0.0009). There was no statistically significant difference in the frequency of MDR infections between the cohorts (OR = 0.25; 95% CI, 0.053-1.14; p = 0.07), however this study was underpowered to detect the difference noted.
conclusionsCeftazidime appears to be a safe and effective alternative treatment option compared with cefotaxime in the NICU with no increase in the risk of culture-positive LOS or MDR infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.