Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38130201›Full record

ReviewZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2023

[Research progress of rapid surgery for hip fracture in elderly patients].

Chao Han, Xiaodan Li, Xiang Sun, Zhe Han, Jianan Liu, Weiwei He, Qiang Dong

Open access · greenAbstract readReviewEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Review in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Predictive value of the pre-injury Barthel index for 1-year postoperative case fatality rate after hip arthroplasty in elderly patients with hip fracture].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chao HanDepartment of Hip Traumatology, Division Ⅱ, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University (Tianjin Hospital), Tianjin, 300211, P. R. China.
Xiaodan LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Tianjin First Center Hospital, Tianjin, 300192, P. R. China.
Xiang SunDepartment of Hip Traumatology, Division Ⅱ, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University (Tianjin Hospital), Tianjin, 300211, P. R. China.
Zhe HanDepartment of Hip Traumatology, Division Ⅱ, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University (Tianjin Hospital), Tianjin, 300211, P. R. China.
Jianan LiuDepartment of Hip Traumatology, Division Ⅱ, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University (Tianjin Hospital), Tianjin, 300211, P. R. China.
Weiwei HeDepartment of Hip Traumatology, Division Ⅱ, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University (Tianjin Hospital), Tianjin, 300211, P. R. China.
Qiang DongDepartment of Hip Traumatology, Division Ⅱ, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University (Tianjin Hospital), Tianjin, 300211, P. R. China.
Tianjin Hospital · CNTianjin First Center Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To review the research progress of rapid surgery for hip fracture in elderly patients. Methods: The published studies, expert consensus, and guidelines at home and abroad were systematically summarized from the aspects of the characteristics of aging population, the benefits of rapid surgery, the disadvantages of delayed surgery, and the recommendations of current guidelines, so as to further guide clinical practice. Results: Hip fracture is a common fracture type in the elderly population. As elderly patients generally have poor physique and often have a variety of underlying diseases, such as hypostatic pneumonia, bedsore, lower limb vein thrombosis, and other complications in conservative treatment, its disability rate and mortality are high, so surgical treatment is the first choice. At present, most relevant studies and expert consensus and guidelines at home and abroad support rapid surgery, that is, preoperative examination should be started immediately after admission, and adverse factors such as taking anticoagulant drugs, serious cardiovascular diseases, and severe anemia should be clearly and actively corrected, and surgery should be completed within 48 hours after admission as far as possible. Rapid surgery can not only significantly reduce the mortality of patients, but also reduce the length of hospital stay and the incidence of perioperative cognitive impairment, which is conducive to the recovery of patients with pain during hospitalization and postoperative function, and improve the prognosis of patients. Conclusion: In order to avoid many problems caused by delayed surgery, the elderly patients with hip fracture should be operated as soon as possible under the condition of actively correcting the adverse factors. Comprehensive evaluation and preparation, the development of an individualized surgical plan, and the formation of a multidisciplinary medical team can reduce surgical risks and improve effectiveness.

Indexed as

AnemiaHip FracturesAgedBiomedical ResearchHospitalizationHumansIncidenceLength of StayRetrospective Studieselderly patientHip fractureimpact factorsurgery timing

Identifiers

PMID38130201
PMCPMC10739674
OpenAlexW4390120536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.