ArticleWomen's health (London, England)
Integrating long-acting reversible contraceptives into primary care internal medicine practices: A clinical innovation to reduce wait time.
Article in Women's health (London, England). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLong-acting reversible contraception (LARC) has long been regarded as highly effective and safe. However, access is limited and lengthy when specialty referrals are required.
objectivesTo integrate LARC services into an urban internal medicine primary care practice to decrease wait time for LARC procedures. DESIGN/
methodsThis pre-post with control group study took place at two large urban academic primary care practices (Practices A and B) and included patients ages 18 to 45 years assigned female sex at birth. Pre-implementation baseline data were collected retrospectively from 2019 to 2020 by identifying subjects who requested LARC insertion or removal via their primary care practice and were referred to Obstetrics and Gynecology (Ob/Gyn) for the procedure. Wait time was noted from time of initial request in the medical record to time of procedure. Practice A developed an integrated primary care LARC program in which one of their LARC-trained providers began offering these procedures within their own practice. All other providers within the practice were educated on how to counsel patients about the devices and procedures. Practice B did not have an in-house LARC provider and continued referring patients to Ob/Gyn. Post-implementation data were collected prospectively 2021-2022.
resultsNinety-one patients in Practice A experienced a significant decrease in wait time (87 vs 21 days,
conclusionIntegrating LARC services into a primary care internal medicine practice can significantly reduce wait times for these procedures with the potential to contribute to increased reproductive and menstrual autonomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38130094What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.